Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital Cameras (Point and Shoot) > Panasonic / Leica

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Feb 17, 2006, 9:06 AM   #1
Junior Member
 
jhnel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 12
Default

I have a 5 mega pixel camera and only print 10 x 15 cm. I don't do a lot of cropping either.

If I need to save memory card space and want to shoot at a lower resolution, how low could I go before the print quality will deteriorate? I also have a choice between ‘Fine' and ‘Standard' Quality. Should I stick to ‘Fine' which also takes up more space, but the quality is higher.

My choices are 2560x1920; 2304x1728; 2048x1536; 1600x1200; 1280x960; 640x480

Quality ‘Fine' or ‘Standard'


jhnel is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Feb 17, 2006, 9:39 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
squirl033's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 6,720
Default

10x15cm is only about 4x6". you can getacceptable prints at 1280x960. to figure maximum acceptable print size from a given resolution, divide the number of pixels by 200 to get the size of the print in inches.in this case, 1280/200=6.4, and 960/2=4.8, so you can make a nice 4x6 print.

keep the "fine" quality setting.
squirl033 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 17, 2006, 10:00 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
genece's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,111
Default

Just another opinion but I would keep the Pixels and reduce the quality to standard.

I just do not see much difference in fine and standard unless you are doing a lot of processing.

And the 2048 X 1536 is about the same as a 3 mp camera and I would not go below that...but again its only my opinion

But the Ideal solution would be get more cards and/or a digital wallet.
genece is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 17, 2006, 10:16 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
fmoore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,116
Default

I agree with Gene. I see no difference between Fine (low compression)and Standard (high compression) quality. I keep my FZ5 on Standard and get 800 shots per 1gb card at full resolution.
fmoore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 19, 2006, 10:34 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
José A.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 367
Default

Some pics taked with my FZ10 at 1600x1200 have been printed up to 20x28 cm after some resizing in Photoshop (so yes, they were resized, but they were originally taken at 1600x1200, which can save space in your card... and later, your HD). Just a little bit of color correction (Levels + Hue/Saturation/Brightness, nothing else) added, and they looked OK.


I guess how big can you print a photograph does not depend only on the amount of pixels, but also on the pic being taken "well": in good light conditions, sharp, detailed. Some pics have to be printed smaller than they "should" so you don't notice flaws like noise, blur and such.

My $0.02

José A. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 19, 2006, 12:29 PM   #6
Junior Member
 
jhnel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 12
Default

Thanks to all for comments and opinions. Much appreciated!
jhnel is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 1:29 AM.