|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Hillsboro, Or
Posts: 311
|
![]()
I noticed how much more of the image I can keep if I keep both the camera and the tripod level during my panaroma picture.
Only the camera level ![]() Both the camera and tripod level ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links |
|
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Australia, New South Wales central coast
Posts: 3,645
|
![]()
G'day RR
Aaahhh -yes- ... it goes without saying -but for you to have done such a beaut job in #2 at night with a very low level of light has come out as an excellent image Well done Phil
__________________
Has Lumix mirrorless & superzoom cameras and loves their amazing capabilities Spends 8-9 months each year travelling Australia Recent images at http://www.flickr.com/photos/ozzie_traveller/sets/ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 57
|
![]()
Actually, you don't need to keep the camera level. The requirements are normally that you rotate the camera about a vertical axis with the entrance pupil of the lens positioned on that axis, and keep the camera pointed up or down at a constant angle. If you keep the camera level, the horizon will divide the panorama into two equal parts in every panorama, which is not very imaginative. Tilt the camera up to include more sky when that's the main attraction. Any decent modern stitcher will cope with a tilted camera, but some older ones may not.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|