Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums >

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Jan 3, 2005, 5:37 AM   #11
Junior Member
donka's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 14

Thanks for that - I'll give it a try tonight.
donka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 5, 2005, 7:33 AM   #12
Junior Member
donka's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 14

Seems to work pretty well - pretty much as a standard point and shoot camera which is great for parties etc. with poor lighting. Thanks for the tip on that - the SV is a keeper for me now.
donka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 20, 2005, 6:47 PM   #13
Junior Member
newtuxedo's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2

My son just took a new Optio SV on a trip to Morocco for 2 weeks. He loved it. I've seen the pics and they look to be excellent quality. He did express some problems focusing in low light since they tried to take a lot of pics indoors without flash. He had a new fast SD card and said there was no issue with shot-to-shot delay. At first he had a regular speed SD card that he got with the camera and he did complain about the delay being 4 seconds or so.

I'm curious to hear comments from other new users about this camera as now I'm thinking of buying one rather than a bulkier 10x-12x ultra-zoom camera (e.g. Canon S1 IS, Panasonic, Minolta, Olympus). The combination of 5MP and 5x optical zoom in a compact form factor seems ideal. I'm not a pro, but I take a lot of pics of all types when we travel 4-5 times a year.
newtuxedo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 21, 2005, 3:48 AM   #14
Junior Member
donka's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 14

Personally I really like this camera although I have a few minor issues although I'm hopeful a couple of them can be resolved in a firmware upgrade...

Low light focusing - this camera could really benefit from a AF assist lamp as my old Canon Ixus beats the SV hands down in this area.

Image quality while generally very good, doesn't quite seem as crisp as that I feel a 5mp image should be. That being said the prints thatI make on my Canon IP5000 printer come out superb and I guess the image quality offered is more than adequate for A4 photo prints.

Auto ISO. In P mode this defaults to Auto everytime and you need to manually overide this - Auto normally seems to go with a value of 200 which generates noise when a value of 50 is more than adequate and produces a much cleaner image. I have mapped one of the function buttons to ISO to quickly change this. I wish this would save the last used value for this item when you power on in P mode.

Otherwise I'm happy with this camera until another 5x optical zoom camera in a similar form factor comes on the market that improves on the areas I have listed above.
donka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 7, 2005, 9:00 AM   #15
Junior Member
MiaB's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1

Lemmy wrote:

Maybe I ask this question in the wrong forum, but any help wpuld be apreciated.

I have had my Pentax Optio for one week now, but I am a little dissapointed of the picture quality.

I use highest resolution and best Qua (2560 and***).

First thing that came to my mind is, why the same SD card as used in my older Optio s4i could now store twice as many pictures???????????...in best quality of a %M camera compared to the 4M of the Optio s4i.

Looking through the pictures - some from outside others inside the house - I find them not as detailed as on my older 1.3M Sony!! When you enlarge them they get "unclear" - not as sharp.

For example if I look through them in MS Photo Editor, the properties tell me, that my new pictures taken with the Optio SV is 72 dpi, and the older pictures from a lower quality Sony camera is 180 dpi....

I don't get it!!

Could someone please tell me, if I do something wrong.

Thank you.

Help!! Please :? I bought my Pentax back in January and I'm really disappointed with it I'm not a photographer soI presume that it's something I'm doing wrong, and not a fault of the camera.

My problems arise when I take photo's indoors. I've posted a photo of a friendtaken indoors,under flourescent light, using the P function,and as you can see, the photograph is verypixelated (is that even a word?).

Can any of you experts give me some pointers - what can I do to improve the quality of my indoor pics??

By the way, I don't have any problems taking photo's outside. They come out brilliantly.

MiaB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 4, 2005, 12:24 AM   #16
Senior Member
big_potato's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 487


1. Would the shutter-lag and shot-shot time of the Optio SV be improved by using faster SD cards e.g. SanDisk Ultra II?

2. Also would the built-in "sharpness" & "saturation" controls improve the picture quality? In my older Optio 430RS, they do improve the quality in some situations.

Judging from the file sizes (Optio SV 5Mpixel~ 1.5MB vs Optio 430RS 4Mpixel ~ 2.5MB, and the sample fotoes, I agree that the SV is producing less sharp images than most other card-sized DC's nowaday. I don't believe the standard JPEG algorithm would compress fotoes to smaller size than other DC. Pentax must have stripped off more details than other DC to make the file smaller. I strongly urge Pentax to release a new firmware to compensate for the deficiency (I haven't seen any firmware update for SV in a almost a year).
big_potato is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 1:31 PM.