Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums >

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Feb 26, 2007, 1:34 PM   #1
Posts: n/a

i was just getting ready to get the tamron when low and behold a Pentax Rear Converter-A 1.4X-S showed up on ebay for 129usd BIN. twice as much as the tamron but not their pro model. my A300 and 500mm are both waiting. i've been wanting something with a tad more reach than 300mm that is handholdable. now i'll have a 420mm f5.6..
  Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Feb 27, 2007, 12:21 AM   #2
Senior Member
Hayward's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,318

You want PENTAX stamped on it for the $$$$ ... go ahead.... (And probably actually made by Tamron or someone other than Pentax.)

I have heard very little... in fact NOTHING said ill of the Tamron 1.4x TC. Nor for any platform it is made for, including the in breed boys club of C & N.

Yes you can get slightly (test chart) better for BIG bucks but maybe all but the, darn the $$ purists, reluctantly conceed a really amazing wonderfully economical piece of glass for what it does)

And considering in most other areas SIGMA and TAMRON go 1:1... even to specs and product... there is no comparable Sigma TC.

And you just want an FYI.... not an exempalary WOW pic (just what sunset was tonight)... but full 300/450mm on a P Sigma 70-300 at ISO 800 WITH the Tam 1.4x

I could think of FAR worse results.... especially at 1/45 sec (free hand held and well over by like 10:1 of safe shutter = FL so any lack of quaity is the IS not the TC) and 10D only IS compensating for the 300/450MM. vs the 630mm it actually was... while all the AF/AE stuff is, TC magnification is not reported to the IS or EXIF. And could have been faster but I really like trhe K10D sweet spot exposure AE setting if possible.... hense this f/8 deeper DOF (even exposure) vs the faster 5.6 it could have been.... and still 1/45 sec at 630 mm only IS compensated for 450mm.

Which I guess that gives accolades to BOTH the Tam 1.4 TC and the equally realtively inexpensive but quality SIGMA 70-300mm
(Because no matter what you put a TC on the lens has to perform well to begin with)

And $60 vs near $200 (maybe more)???? For a TC that doesn't REALLY do much if any bettert? (other than on test charts) Again just do the math/practicality :?

(Unless maybe you have a PRO biz you can write it off against.)

PS I wish I had taken a "normal" FL shot of this... but this is definately an under 5 deg FOV and that Cat is a good 1/4 mile+ away at least.

Just look at the apparent size of the sun.
Attached Images
Hayward is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 27, 2007, 12:16 PM   #3
Senior Member
bilybianca's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Hassleholm, Sweden
Posts: 3,457

I've got a Pentax Rear Converter2XS. There is a difference. This pic was cropped... substantially...

Attached Images
bilybianca is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 9:49 PM.