Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums >

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Jan 27, 2008, 8:44 AM   #11
Senior Member
mtngal's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Frazier Park, CA
Posts: 16,177

They do look pretty comparable - either set-up looks like it will work. The Promaster does look like a keeper, for sure.
mtngal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 27, 2008, 3:41 PM   #12
Senior Member
2many's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Costa Rica
Posts: 533

I think its a keeper, Sure its a cheap lens, but I couldnt tell much of a difference.
2many is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 27, 2008, 4:22 PM   #13
Senior Member
robar's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: D/FW area Texas
Posts: 7,590

the reason i'm interested, as all should be, in the performance wide open is because that's where it'll be used the most when shooting wildlife.. i never meant to imply that this was an evaluation other than what it was shot for..

robar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 27, 2008, 8:41 PM   #14
Senior Member
Trojansoc's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Hot Springs, AR
Posts: 3,724

penolta, this is one that was shot with the Phoenix version of the same lens this morning. roy, most of my shots are wide open with this lens. However, this one was at f10 @ 400mm. Shutter speed 1/320, ISO 800.

Pine Warbler, penolta?

Trojansoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 27, 2008, 8:52 PM   #15
Senior Member
penolta's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: California USA
Posts: 5,206

Yes, it is. (I already responded to your other thread). Nice shot.

Thanks for the post and theinfo.
penolta is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:22 PM.