Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums >

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Feb 6, 2007, 4:23 PM   #11
Senior Member
snostorm's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Chicago Suburb, IL, USA
Posts: 2,770

Hi Corpsy,

$25 was a great deal, IMO, especially if it is the "A" version with the electrical contacts (the "M" version, without the contacts, is worth a little bit less for the inconvenience factor -- they are, IIRC, the same optically). When I bought mine last year, I was fine with paying almost 3 times that amount for an "A" version.

If you're interested, JensR did a comparison test between this TC with an A 50 f1.4 and a brand new D FA 100 f2.8 Macro on his website:


I think he showed that the Vivitar 2x MFTC with a good fast sharp prime is a viable alternative to a dedicated macro lens.


Edit : . . . and if you already have a 50 1.4 or 1.7 of any series, the 2x MFTC is a very inexpensive macro alternative, allowing you to focus continuously from 1:1 to infinity at practical working distances -- something that extension tubes and close up lenses won't do.

snostorm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 7, 2007, 5:50 AM   #12
Posts: n/a

snostorm wrote:
Hi Hayward,

I wouldn't be too quick to write off Vivitar as a lensmaker, though they are a mere shadow of what they were quite a while ago.

Their 70-210 f2.8-4 Series 1 (made by Komine) are still highly regarded and actually sought after,
i've got one of those and ,yes, it is a very nice lens. a little warmer than the A70-210f4 ....

  Reply With Quote
Old Feb 7, 2007, 5:38 PM   #13
Senior Member
superakuma's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 550

Well I got the TC in today and I did a few test shots with my pentax 100-300mm. I love the reach that it is able to give me but the TC is VERY hard to use @300mm x2. During the test shots everything came out burry of course at hand held. I will take some more shots and post it up next time when I have time to really test it out. It is very cloudy right now and it is going to rain.

I think this could be decent enough to use and is worth the $14 I spend on it.
superakuma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 14, 2012, 10:44 PM   #14
Junior Member
Freelanceshooter's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Phoenix, Az
Posts: 2
Default Vivtar 2x

I got this converter about 3 weeks ago. I use it with my Canon 75-300 EF lens. I have noticed a definite loss of image quality, especially at longer FL. The other issue I have found, is with the manual focus as well as the auto focus, my images are not sharp and the focus is always off, even with a tripod and using the self timer. The converter is fairly well made, but I am questioning whether or not it is worth the effort. I have been shooting for over 30 years and still have a good eye, but even my best efforts don't seem to facilitate an image that is in sharp focus. I am seriously considering going to a 1x4 converter instead.
Freelanceshooter is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:53 PM.