Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital SLR and Interchangeable Lens Cameras > Pentax Lenses

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Nov 18, 2007, 1:59 AM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3
Default

for a Grandma just wanting some photos of the grandkids in low light conditions...I have the kit lens. I don't want to pay a huge amount of money but I do want sharp photos...I know about the 50 1.4 but I want a zoom lens not priority...


SigmaUSA
Zoom Wide Angle-Telephoto 28-70mm f/2.8-4 DG Compact High Speed to 28-70mm

Thanks for your help.
minmaui is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Nov 18, 2007, 12:27 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
inneyeseakay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 1,379
Default

It's a little faster than the kit lens, the short end MIGHT cut it inside a very well lit room, but that's only on the short end. The fact that you will only be able to use it on the short end pretty much means your going to be using this just like you would a prime indoors. I would definately shoot for the FA50/1.4 or maybe FA 35/2. They are faster and a prime is almost always going to be sharper than a zoom.

-Nick
inneyeseakay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 18, 2007, 1:02 PM   #3
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3
Default

Thanks Nick...I'm so new to this that I need all of the help I can get.
minmaui is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 18, 2007, 4:24 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
VTphotog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Extreme Northeastern Vermont, USA
Posts: 4,214
Default

I think you might find the 50/1.4 not quite wide enough, if you are talking about indoor shots.

Grandkids move around a lot, and in low light, even F/1,4 often won't give you enough speed. Is there some overriding reason not to use flash? If it is because the kids stop what they are doing to wait for you to shoot more pictures, don't worry - after a while they quit noticing and get on with their business.

An external flash which can be bounced off the ceiling, for more even illumination, could very well be a better investment. If you can get them to hold still, natural light shots can be more aesthetically pleasing, but that is an awfully big 'if'.

brian
VTphotog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 18, 2007, 7:40 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
robar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: D/FW area Texas
Posts: 7,590
Default

i think you would like the 50/1.4... for the speed. any zoom that f2-2.8 will be expensive, very..
here's some shots with the M50/1.4 wide open. it'll also give you an idea of the field of view you'll get.. this was regular dim restaurant lighting..exif should be there.





about 2 feet away.



roy
robar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 18, 2007, 7:42 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
robar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: D/FW area Texas
Posts: 7,590
Default

i lied, there's no exif but i can get it for you if you want the details.

roy
robar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 18, 2007, 9:31 PM   #7
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3
Default

Thanks for the feedback everyone...
minmaui is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:15 PM.