Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital SLR and Interchangeable Lens Cameras > Pentax Lenses

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Oct 29, 2008, 10:37 AM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 4
Default

Hello, Just wondering if anyone has/had it and what do you feel about this lens.

Thanks

Victor
vizjerei is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Oct 29, 2008, 3:32 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
robar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: D/FW area Texas
Posts: 7,590
Default

i don't know victor but the super-takumar(non-smc) 300/4 is a dynamite lens, also the non-smc 500/4.5 and the 500/4.5 smc is close to nuclear.
i've heard very good reports on the 400/5.6.. what we all want/covet is a 400/4 or 400/2.8..............but alas, few here can afford one. if you get the 400/5.6 at a good price like <300usd then i doubt you'll be disappointed..

roy
robar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 30, 2008, 9:51 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
bigdawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Thach Alabama
Posts: 14,981
Default

Should be a very good lens if you aren't shooting low light subjects. Sharpest photos will be an f-stop or two from wide open. One limitation is the distance you can obtain a good focus. The longer lens demand more distance to focus them. Most 400 5.6 lens focus down to 8 meters or about 26 feet or so.. So if you plan on shooting closer it won't do it. Now saying that you can use macro extension tubes to do closer photos. I have a 400mm 6.3 that Ive used a homemade extension tube to get as close as 10 feet and still get sharp photos.

Dawg
bigdawg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 30, 2008, 11:50 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
snostorm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Chicago Suburb, IL, USA
Posts: 2,770
Default

Hi Victor,

I only know this lens by reputation. There aren't any older Pentax long tele lenses that aren't at least very good, and this lens was rated (**)(very good) in the SPLOSdb, which I have always trusted for ratings of older lenses. I usually wouldn't personally consider a lens rated any lower than (*) in the SPLOSdb, so I'd easily take a chance on one of these at a good price -- and I'd say that Roy is definitely in the ballpark here.

Dawg has made a good point about minimum focusing distances. The older teles usually don't focus very close, and this one's MFD is about 8 meters. The subsequent Pentax 400/5.6s reduced the MFD to 5m in the "M", 2.8m in the "A*", and 2m in the (FA*). The prices asked for these newer models will, of course, be higher, as there is no free lunch. . . the "star" classed lenses will command the premium they usually deserve, and are much harder to find at affordable prices.

Scott
snostorm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 31, 2008, 6:05 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
thkn777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,831
Default

There is a nice offer for a Panagor PMC 400/5,6 - any hints on that? I am looking for a fast lens that isn't too heavy but still has long reach and is usable wide open...
thkn777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 31, 2008, 12:12 PM   #6
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 4
Default

Thank guys, I don't think I can affard A or later version , not mention those * version :P I guess I will try this lens. I am thinking using it for wildlife like dear or bear... MF should be fine i guess and I won't be too close with them anyways

vizjerei is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 5:35 PM.