Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital SLR and Interchangeable Lens Cameras > Pentax Lenses

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old May 11, 2011, 7:48 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 105
Default Sigma 50-500 OS vs Sigma 120-400 OS vs Sigma 50-500 (no OS)

Hello -

I am looking for a new lens with more reach than my current 300mm DA. I am packing the K-r. I have been looking into the lenses in the subject line and I was looking for comparisons, personal experience and any info that will help me come to a decision.

I know that there is a 150-500mm in this range too, but I think that one is like 1.5-2.0 inches longer than the ones mentioned above, and about the same weight as the current 50-500mm. While money is an object I have the budget for any one of these...

I am willing to take suggestions outside my scope, and willing to spend more if the bang is worth it.

Let me know if you have any input and I thank everyone in advance for their links, direction and thoughts.

LBA
mackloon is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old May 12, 2011, 12:51 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
shoturtle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Frankfurt AM
Posts: 11,348
Default

With all the lenses you have under consideration. You will be shooting off a tripod allot so OS is not that important, unless you plan on using them handheld at times, the OS is a must have with that much FL.
__________________
Super Frequent Flyer, no joke. Ex Patriot and loving it.
Canon Eos 60D, T1i/500D, Eos1, Eos 630, Olympus EPL-1, and a part time Pentax K-X shooter.
shoturtle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 16, 2011, 9:02 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: East Central Vermont
Posts: 1,890
Default

I have no first-hand experience with any of those lenses, but I have read that the Sigma 150-500 has very good optics. If that's true then I would be willing to put up with the extra 1.5 - 2 inches. Keep in mind that all these lenses are already very large and bulky.
mtnman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 4, 2011, 6:03 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
bigdawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Thach Alabama
Posts: 14,981
Default

From a Tripod I like the 50-500. Don't know that it is sharper than the 150-500 but it does have more range.
__________________
Big Dawg
bigdawg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 7, 2011, 11:44 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Biro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 835
Default

I've tried the Sigma 150-500 on a Nikon body and liked it quite a bit. The optics are quite good. And it is a substantial bit of kit - it's size and weight may put off some people. That didn't really bother me. But, at $1,000, I won't be picking one up soon.
Biro is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:40 AM.