|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,893
|
![]() ![]() ![]() The cropped one? I just did not have enough light to get both in focus. Otherwise the full image would have been impressive Daniel |
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links |
|
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Thach Alabama
Posts: 14,981
|
![]()
No. 2. Gives a view like I was there myself!
Dawg |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 6,084
|
![]()
I like #2, as it shows a perceived reason for the uproar. Great shot Daniel!...cheers...Don
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Antwerp - Belgium
Posts: 3,454
|
![]()
First sight nr1, but that is because the duck is bigger.
nr2 a bit larger would be better, but then I would crop that one a bit on te left side so the duck isn't that much in the center. seems that I haven't given an answer :blah: great shot however. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Hassleholm, Sweden
Posts: 3,457
|
![]()
Going forth and back I think I finally set for #1, leaving to the imagination what onearth the duck is upset about.
Kjell |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,893
|
![]()
Don, Ed, rhermans Kjell
Thank for giving the input. Shooting birds sometimes you never know what you may come up with . Also I was playing around with shooting at almost water/low level. Seeing things from that angle is different. I was used to shooting from low angle only with a FE. This is different Daniel |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Winter Haven, Florida
Posts: 6,515
|
![]()
I like em both Dan.
i really like the low angle! ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Chicago Suburb, IL, USA
Posts: 2,770
|
![]()
Hi Daniel,
I too like the low angle. I've been trying for that more this year. I also like #1 better. It may only be prejudice, but I really try to not have extraneous parts of bodies except for some unusual circumstances were it seems to work. . . Scott |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Northwest Ohio
Posts: 1,965
|
![]()
Good work, Daniel. I like #1 because of the closeness of the subject, but I also like #2 because, as has already been said, it gives some context.
Glenn |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,893
|
![]()
Lyrics51 wrote:
Quote:
Thanks again for the input ![]() I have been playing around with several image of the low-angle perspective. This one came out with a strange glow on the duck. Daniel |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|