Which is better of the two?

[danielchtong]

The cropped one?

I just did not have enough light to get both in focus. Otherwise the full image would have been impressive



Daniel

[bigdawg]

No. 2. Gives a view like I was there myself!

Dawg

[thekman620]

I like #2, as it shows a perceived reason for the uproar. Great shot Daniel!...cheers...Don

[rhermans]

First sight nr1, but that is because the duck is bigger.
nr2 a bit larger would be better, but then I would crop that one a bit on te left side so the duck isn't that much in the center.

seems that I haven't given an answer :blah:

great shot however.

[bilybianca]

Going forth and back I think I finally set for #1, leaving to the imagination what onearth the duck is upset about.

Kjell

[danielchtong]

Don, Ed, rhermans Kjell

Thank for giving the input. Shooting birds sometimes you never know what you may come up with . Also I was playing around with shooting at almost water/low level. Seeing things from that angle is different. I was used to shooting from low angle only with a FE. This is different

Daniel

[Goldwinger]

I like em both Dan.
i really like the low angle!

[snostorm]

Hi Daniel,

I too like the low angle. I've been trying for that more this year. I also like #1 better. It may only be prejudice, but I really try to not have extraneous parts of bodies except for some unusual circumstances were it seems to work. . .

Scott

[Lyrics51]

Good work, Daniel. I like #1 because of the closeness of the subject, but I also like #2 because, as has already been said, it gives some context.

Glenn

[danielchtong]

Lyrics51 wrote:

Good work, Daniel. I like #1 because of the closeness of the subject, but I also like #2 because, as has already been said, it gives some context.

Glenn

Goldwinger, Scott & Glenn

Thanks again for the input



I have been playing around with several image of the low-angle perspective. This one came out with a strange glow on the duck.


Daniel