|
|||||||
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Nov 5, 2007, 5:24 AM
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,893
|
We have a bright but still cloudy day and I still have problem with the bokeh . If it is more creamy it would have been perfect
  Daniel, Toronto |
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
Nov 5, 2007, 9:41 AM
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Thach Alabama
Posts: 14,981
|
Nice ones Daniel.. How far away were you? Distance can affect the Bokeh.
PS...Where is you pic in the your pic thread? Dawg |
|
|
|
|
Nov 5, 2007, 2:32 PM
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Northwest Ohio
Posts: 1,965
|
The bokeh isn't all that bad since the subject looks great! Just make believe its some sort of impressionistic thing!
Glenn |
|
|
|
|
Nov 5, 2007, 2:41 PM
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Posts: 421
|
Pic 1 is a great capture. It's funny but I don't mind the bokeh at all, for me it just emphasises the subject.
I just hope you ducked in time! Keith |
|
|
|
|
Nov 5, 2007, 5:35 PM
|
#5 | ||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,893
|
Keithw wrote:
Quote:
Keith, Glenn & Dawg, Thanks for taking time to comment. The bokeh is likely more the result of the cropping Keith: they were say 40 ft away and the pict was a cropped one. I have no clue if the one (below) is more captivating. The first one has the back light, full wing and tail details. This one is another story  Quote:
Daniel |
||
|
|
|
|
Nov 5, 2007, 10:08 PM
|
#6 | |||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Thach Alabama
Posts: 14,981
|
danielchtong wrote:
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
Nov 5, 2007, 10:45 PM
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Frazier Park, CA
Posts: 16,177
|
I don't find the bokeh that distracting in the first one or the last one. You can always try blurring the background some (I usually copy the background layer, blur the top layer, then apply a mask to the top layer and "paint out" what I don't want blurred, or do it the other way around where I blur the background layer after copying and perhaps sharpening the top layer also). Even the second one isn't as bad as what I've gotten a couple of times when I've taken squirrels or flowers above a pine needle background.
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 5, 2007, 11:40 PM
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,198
|
I agree, the first one looks just fine to me.
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 6, 2007, 4:27 PM
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,154
|
Daniel, I also like the first shot, great capture. My only issue is with the line that crosses the background, too bad it is so obvious. Maybe a little smudging or cloning could mute it a little.
Ira |
|
|
|
|
Nov 8, 2007, 4:12 PM
|
#10 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 393
|
Really like the Heron capture.
Beautiful image. Ian Mc. |
|
|
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 6:53 PM.
