|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Morganton, NC
Posts: 228
|
![]()
photo elements 6 for mac is what I used for these. Don't know why the EXIF is not showing?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Yeronga, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 3,518
|
![]()
Photoshop Elements removes exif when you save for web, I now save as and then use EasyCrop on my Mac.
Nice photos, you're certainly helping decide to retire my Sigma 70-300mm F4-5.6 APO DG for the Pentax DA 55-300mm f/4-5.8 ED Lens. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: D/FW area Texas
Posts: 7,590
|
![]()
Rodney9 wrote:
Quote:
roy |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: California USA
Posts: 5,206
|
![]()
I don't mean to hijack this thread with its excellent closeups, but I have just switched to a Mac. I used PSE 2 and Adobe's original Photo Deluxe for quickie pp in Windows. I bought PSE 6 yesterday, and have been looking at Image Well as a MAC replacement for APD (which was the first version of what became PSE). Has anyone tried Image Well - it looks really neat?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lake Placid Florida USA
Posts: 2,689
|
![]()
Those are all great shots and make a good case for this lens as a near macro. Out of curiosity, what is the maximum magnification for th 55-300?
Tim |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Morganton, NC
Posts: 228
|
![]()
It is 1:3.5
It seems to be a very sharp lens and a great walk around size. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|