Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums >

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Jan 20, 2008, 1:07 AM   #1
Senior Member
Illuminati's Avatar
Join Date: May 2006
Location: California, USA
Posts: 583

I was fortunate enough to gain free admission into this year's Macworld Expo in San Francisco. One of the products that caught my eye was a nifty product called the Eye-Fi wireless 2GB SD Card. It is a standard 2GB SD memory card combined with a Wi-Fi transmitter that allows you to upload photos wirelessly from your camera to your PC, Mac, or online photo-sharing site (like Flickr). As you take photos, the 2GB of memory stores them. When the Eye-Fi comes in contact with an open or pre-configured Wi-Fi connection, the photos stored in memory will begin to upload to your destination. The card supposedly does not drain much from the camera's battery, as it has very low power consumption.

I watched as the demonstrator took a photo, and watched as it uploaded almost instantly to the demo Mac and into iPhoto. Being the skeptic, I asked if I could try the memory card in my K100D and see what happens then. Fortunately, he agreed, and I popped it in the DSLR. I took a snapshot, and nothing happened. That's when I learned that the Eye-Fi does not support RAW files yet. I changed the quality from RAW to *** and gave it another attempt. It seemed to take longer to save the JPEG to the card and get it into iPhoto when compared to the digital P&S that they were using for the demo. This time, however, the image did upload successfully, although the upload time was considerably longer as well.

I can see much potential for this company's product, especially with event photographers. They just need to up the memory to 4GB, and support RAW before I'll consider buying one. At $99, it's somewhat reasonable for a realtime wireless storage solution, but pricey for just a memory card.

Here's their site: http://www.eye.fi/

- Jason
Illuminati is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Jan 20, 2008, 8:34 AM   #2
Senior Member
nadnerb's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Bath, UK
Posts: 319

I'm sure these have been around for years now.
At least I remember seeing a similar report a few years back.

The idea is good, but like you say, it's slow!
No doubt the demo P&S was set to the lowest quality and the smallest file size.
nadnerb is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 8:35 AM.