Steve'sDigicams

inneyeseakay · Sep 10, 2007, 9:11 PM

Okay, when I had my K100d, I hardly noticed any difference in shooting with my non-stabilized *istDS. Now, with the K10d, there is actually a noticable difference.

Check this out. K10d & APO DG70-300

300mm, f/5.6,1/10", Close Range (exif attached)... SR working overtime!

mtngal · Sep 10, 2007, 10:20 PM

SR and a steady hand - amazing what they can do! Nice picture.

lesmore49 · Sep 10, 2007, 10:24 PM

300 mm...did you say 1/10 of a second and was that without a tripod? If I got that right..I'm impressed with the clarity of the picture. That SR is worth it.

inneyeseakay · Sep 11, 2007, 6:31 AM

Yes, This is at 300mm at 1/10"... Handheld. I too was impressed. This was also quite close, no cropping was done.

bilybianca · Sep 11, 2007, 10:11 AM

inneyeseakay wrote:

Quote:

I too was impressed.

So am I!

Kjell

bigdawg · Sep 11, 2007, 1:21 PM

Lot easier than the Kodak isn't it Inn!! LOL

Dawg

CyberCoyote · Sep 11, 2007, 7:16 PM

Le Sigh.. someday. Every time I convince myself the K100D is perfect for me I gotta read/see these examples. Le huff, le puff..

Gazander · Sep 11, 2007, 11:27 PM

Only thing k100d has going for it is the better sensor. Less noise and up to iso3200.

For everything else, K10d wins hands down. Speed, usability, features, customizability, etc

inneyeseakay · Sep 11, 2007, 11:37 PM

"better sensor" is really quite a broad statement. I think it would be more appropriate to say "higher ISO options." Personally, I have found that the K10d performs just as well as the K100/*ist Sensor at ISO1600 (after the 1.30 firmware update). Calling a 6mp sensor "better" than the 10mp equivilant because it offers ISO3200...? Maybe it's just me, but that's a bit far fetched.

Speaking of ISO, the picture above was taken at ISO1600. No noise processing was done either.

bigdawg · Sep 11, 2007, 11:41 PM

CyberCoyote wrote:

Quote:

Le Sigh.. someday. Every time I convince myself the K100D is perfect for me I gotta read/see these examples. Le huff, le puff..

Takea heard Mon Ami...Ze K100D supier weel Aurive sune!! Au Hau!!

In thu Mean time yern's as good as any!!

Dawg

Sep 10, 2007, 9:11 PM	#1
inneyeseakay Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Columbia, SC Posts: 1,379	Okay, when I had my K100d, I hardly noticed any difference in shooting with my non-stabilized *istDS. Now, with the K10d, there is actually a noticable difference. Check this out. K10d & APO DG70-300 300mm, f/5.6,1/10", Close Range (exif attached)... SR working overtime! Attached Images

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

Steve'sDigicams

Recent Camera Reviews

Most Active Forums

Most Popular Deals

Latest Feature Articles

Sep 10, 2007, 10:20 PM	#2
mtngal Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Frazier Park, CA Posts: 16,177	SR and a steady hand - amazing what they can do! Nice picture.

Sep 10, 2007, 10:24 PM	#3
lesmore49 Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Western Canada Posts: 3,076	300 mm...did you say 1/10 of a second and was that without a tripod? If I got that right..I'm impressed with the clarity of the picture. That SR is worth it.

Sep 11, 2007, 6:31 AM	#4
inneyeseakay Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Columbia, SC Posts: 1,379	Yes, This is at 300mm at 1/10"... Handheld. I too was impressed. This was also quite close, no cropping was done.

Sep 11, 2007, 1:21 PM	#6
bigdawg Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Thach Alabama Posts: 14,981	Lot easier than the Kodak isn't it Inn!! LOL Dawg

Sep 11, 2007, 7:16 PM	#7
CyberCoyote Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 257	Le Sigh.. someday. Every time I convince myself the K100D is perfect for me I gotta read/see these examples. Le huff, le puff..

Sep 11, 2007, 11:27 PM	#8
Gazander Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 272	Only thing k100d has going for it is the better sensor. Less noise and up to iso3200. For everything else, K10d wins hands down. Speed, usability, features, customizability, etc

Sep 11, 2007, 11:37 PM	#9
inneyeseakay Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Columbia, SC Posts: 1,379	"better sensor" is really quite a broad statement. I think it would be more appropriate to say "higher ISO options." Personally, I have found that the K10d performs just as well as the K100/ist Sensor at ISO1600 (after the 1.30 firmware update). Calling a 6mp sensor "better*" than the 10mp equivilant because it offers ISO3200...? Maybe it's just me, but that's a bit far fetched. Speaking of ISO, the picture above was taken at ISO1600. No noise processing was done either.