|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 1,379
|
![]()
Okay, when I had my K100d, I hardly noticed any difference in shooting with my non-stabilized *istDS. Now, with the K10d, there is actually a noticable difference.
Check this out. K10d & APO DG70-300 300mm, f/5.6,1/10", Close Range (exif attached)... SR working overtime! |
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links |
|
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Frazier Park, CA
Posts: 16,177
|
![]()
SR and a steady hand - amazing what they can do! Nice picture.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Western Canada
Posts: 3,076
|
![]()
300 mm...did you say 1/10 of a second and was that without a tripod? If I got that right..I'm impressed with the clarity of the picture. That SR is worth it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 1,379
|
![]()
Yes, This is at 300mm at 1/10"... Handheld. I too was impressed. This was also quite close, no cropping was done.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Hassleholm, Sweden
Posts: 3,457
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Thach Alabama
Posts: 14,981
|
![]()
Lot easier than the Kodak isn't it Inn!! LOL
Dawg |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 257
|
![]()
Le Sigh.. someday. Every time I convince myself the K100D is perfect for me I gotta read/see these examples. Le huff, le puff..
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 272
|
![]()
Only thing k100d has going for it is the better sensor. Less noise and up to iso3200.
For everything else, K10d wins hands down. Speed, usability, features, customizability, etc |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 1,379
|
![]()
"better sensor" is really quite a broad statement. I think it would be more appropriate to say "higher ISO options." Personally, I have found that the K10d performs just as well as the K100/*ist Sensor at ISO1600 (after the 1.30 firmware update). Calling a 6mp sensor "better" than the 10mp equivilant because it offers ISO3200...? Maybe it's just me, but that's a bit far fetched.
Speaking of ISO, the picture above was taken at ISO1600. No noise processing was done either. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Thach Alabama
Posts: 14,981
|
![]()
CyberCoyote wrote:
Quote:
In thu Mean time yern's as good as any!! Dawg |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|