|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: D/FW area Texas
Posts: 7,590
|
![]()
are these better??
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: D/FW area Texas
Posts: 7,590
|
![]()
.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: D/FW area Texas
Posts: 7,590
|
![]()
.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Wigan, UK
Posts: 568
|
![]()
oh yes, much better now. I assume they are crops from full frame, even so very nice photos with lots of details and sharpness.
greg |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Wigan, UK
Posts: 568
|
![]()
oh yes, much better now. I assume they are crops from full frame, even so very nice photos with lots of details and sharpness.
greg |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,198
|
![]()
Nice shots Roy, that old glass is not only sharp but has great contrast.
Tom |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lake Placid Florida USA
Posts: 2,689
|
![]()
Ah yes, the second set is much better. Nice shots Roy, but it looks like you need to clean your sensor too.
Tim |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: D/FW area Texas
Posts: 7,590
|
![]()
i know. just been putting it off..
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lake Placid Florida USA
Posts: 2,689
|
![]()
robar wrote:
Quote:
Heh, I realize mypost was ambigous, the "too" meant that I need to clean both of mine also :roll:. Tim |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: D/FW area Texas
Posts: 7,590
|
![]()
NonEntity1 wrote:
Quote:
roy |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|