Steve'sDigicams

CyberCoyote · Sep 14, 2007, 10:57 PM

Both nice but #2. The lack of the trees in the foreground plus the exposure cutting out the other trees in the background simplify the overall image. The more orange tone from the exposure is more soothing, too.

Lyrics51 · Sep 14, 2007, 11:07 PM

Tough choice, Kjell. Both would look nice up on the wall.

Glenn

bigdawg · Sep 15, 2007, 12:15 AM

Kjell...the first one would be a winner without the tree limbs on the side....No 2 to me is more stark and doesn't have the depth of the first one plus I like the line in the first running left to right...Gives it a more natural look as if I am standing in that spot looking at this scene live. Both are very good and with out the "side by side" comparison would be accepted as very very good. Just one old Dawg's opinion.

Dawg

bilybianca · Sep 15, 2007, 3:20 AM

Thanks all for the constructive and extensive comments. They go in line with my own view. It was a pity I didn't have the time to walk a little closer for the first shot, to get rid of those branches. Would just have taken a minute, but it would have taken an hour to go home and change clothes and shoes afterwords. Work is a time-thief!To the right was a light pole.

What I like myself about these pictures is the near-sepia-look, even though they are both full colour shots. Contrast enhanced with the levels adjustment in RSP (Raw Shooter Premium). Anyone else still use that RAW converter?

Kjell

Black Knight · Sep 15, 2007, 6:44 AM

bilybianca wrote:

Quote:

Contrast enhanced with the levels adjustment in RSP (Raw Shooter Premium). Anyone else still use that RAW converter?

Kjell

Hi Kjell

I still Use RSP. I actually have two versions. I have the normal version for my DS. And i have the moded version that works with my K100D.

Phil

nhmom · Sep 15, 2007, 8:02 AM

I really like the second one. The first one's good, but the second to me is outstanding.

bilybianca · Sep 15, 2007, 9:03 AM

Black Knight wrote:

Quote:

I still Use RSP. I actually have two versions. I have the normal version for my DS. And i have the moded version that works with my K100D.

What is moded in the moded version? Taking K100D RAWs, of course. Anything else?

Kjell

Black Knight · Sep 15, 2007, 12:18 PM

Kjell

I did not do the moding on It. It basically is just modified So that it opens the K100d and K10D Pictures To be worked on. The features are the same.
However for some reason it works for some people and it will Not work for others. Personally It works just fine for me.

Phil

CyberCoyote · Sep 15, 2007, 4:51 PM

Hmm, bummer. I tried to find RSP and it turns out adobe bought them out so now you have to buy lightroom to get the technology, not for 59 bucks mind you

robar · Sep 15, 2007, 5:36 PM

2

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

Steve'sDigicams

Recent Camera Reviews

Most Active Forums

Most Popular Deals

Latest Feature Articles

Sep 14, 2007, 10:57 PM	#11
CyberCoyote Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 257	Both nice but #2. The lack of the trees in the foreground plus the exposure cutting out the other trees in the background simplify the overall image. The more orange tone from the exposure is more soothing, too.

Sep 14, 2007, 11:07 PM	#12
Lyrics51 Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Northwest Ohio Posts: 1,965	Tough choice, Kjell. Both would look nice up on the wall. Glenn

Sep 15, 2007, 12:15 AM	#13
bigdawg Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Thach Alabama Posts: 14,981	Kjell...the first one would be a winner without the tree limbs on the side....No 2 to me is more stark and doesn't have the depth of the first one plus I like the line in the first running left to right...Gives it a more natural look as if I am standing in that spot looking at this scene live. Both are very good and with out the "side by side" comparison would be accepted as very very good. Just one old Dawg's opinion. Dawg

Sep 15, 2007, 3:20 AM	#14
bilybianca Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Hassleholm, Sweden Posts: 3,457	Thanks all for the constructive and extensive comments. They go in line with my own view. It was a pity I didn't have the time to walk a little closer for the first shot, to get rid of those branches. Would just have taken a minute, but it would have taken an hour to go home and change clothes and shoes afterwords. Work is a time-thief!To the right was a light pole. What I like myself about these pictures is the near-sepia-look, even though they are both full colour shots. Contrast enhanced with the levels adjustment in RSP (Raw Shooter Premium). Anyone else still use that RAW converter? Kjell

Sep 15, 2007, 8:02 AM	#16
nhmom Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Southern New Hampshire Posts: 5,202	I really like the second one. The first one's good, but the second to me is outstanding.

Sep 15, 2007, 12:18 PM	#18
Black Knight Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Oxford, CT Posts: 1,309	Kjell I did not do the moding on It. It basically is just modified So that it opens the K100d and K10D Pictures To be worked on. The features are the same. However for some reason it works for some people and it will Not work for others. Personally It works just fine for me. Phil

Sep 15, 2007, 4:51 PM	#19
CyberCoyote Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 257	Hmm, bummer. I tried to find RSP and it turns out adobe bought them out so now you have to buy lightroom to get the technology, not for 59 bucks mind you

Sep 15, 2007, 5:36 PM	#20
robar Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: D/FW area Texas Posts: 7,590	2