|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,893
|
![]()
Thanks to Roy who has reduced the noise level of thesetwo pict. Next time if you have noisy pict, email that to Roy to fix it.
Maybe I got that in film days, post processing is always the last thing I want to do. ![]() This one before noise reduction ![]() Again noise reduced ![]() This is before(big time noise at iso1600) ![]() Daniel |
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links |
|
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,154
|
![]()
Daniel, I use a fast (though not necessarily sophisticated) program called Noiseware. The Community version is free and it does a decent job of cleaning up images.
Ira |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: D/FW area Texas
Posts: 7,590
|
![]()
danielchtong wrote:
Quote:
PP is something i really enjoy. it seems every time i open a raw file in PS i learn something new. roy |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Northwest Ohio
Posts: 1,965
|
![]()
I use Neat Image and it works pretty well. One thingI have foundis that noise reduction works best on the full picture. If you are going to crop, do the noise reduction first and then crop it.
Glenn |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Oxford, CT
Posts: 1,309
|
![]()
I will second Glen. I use both Neat Image and Noise Ninja. However i just feel more Comfortable With Neat Image. I use the Home + version and it plugs into all the major Programs(PSE, PSP, PS)
Both are great programs though. Phil |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: NW. England
Posts: 1,202
|
![]()
I use the Imagenomic Noiseware plug-in with PSCS2, very rarely do I change it's default settings, it does an excellent job. I've tried Noise Ninja, but don't think I've ever fully understood it. ... Jack.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|