|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: D/FW area Texas
Posts: 7,590
|
![]()
i was told on another forum that this looked over sharpened and looked plasticly..
your opinion??? hey, i can take it! ![]() roy |
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links |
|
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Hassleholm, Sweden
Posts: 3,457
|
![]()
OK, Roy, it looks oversharpened. Maybe not plastic, but somehow artificial. Maybe oversaturated?
Kjell |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Abilene. TX
Posts: 1,486
|
![]()
The bird looks perfect to me. It is probably the upper and upper right side of the photo. What is that blue in the branch and parts of sky?
DonR |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Frazier Park, CA
Posts: 16,177
|
![]()
Definitely oversharpened. Looks like you blurred the background, or did a layer mask to block out the background from being sharpened and the edges around the tailfeathers show it (not quite clean enough edges - the background right next to the tailfeathers and around the bird's neckshow the effects). I've never quite understood what some mean by "plasticy".
Or else you "pushed" it because it was too dark and introducedlots of extra noise (ISO 400 isn't enough to cause that much), then blurred the background. In any case, it's not one of your better post-processing efforts. You take so many wonderful pictures, is there a reason you spent a fair amount of effort on this particular one? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 1,259
|
![]()
it depends on which screen i look at it on
on the lcd it appears oversharp on the crt it looks not so bad |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: D/FW area Texas
Posts: 7,590
|
![]()
thanks,
i'll go back to the original and ck it out. roy |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Antwerp - Belgium
Posts: 3,454
|
![]()
Don't understand the reason for calling is looking plasticly,
it is a bit to sharp for my taste and as Gumnut says it looks sharpest on my lcd. Don't dare to say anything about colour, I'm at work now and having a descent crt/lcd dual screen they are not calibrated. Ronny |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,154
|
![]()
I would not say plasticky but it does look a little oversharpened. Great shot though.
Ira |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: NW. England
Posts: 1,202
|
![]()
Gumnut wrote:
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: D/FW area Texas
Posts: 7,590
|
![]()
thanks,
on both of my CRTs it looks fine even tho i may have sharpened a little much. at 400% i detect no halos tho. roy |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|