|
|||||||
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Oct 19, 2007, 7:03 PM
|
#1 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 4
|
My DL has given inconsistent performance with continuous autofocus while shooting my sons' soccer games. Is the continuous autofocus system on the K100D more responsive and consistent? Thanks.
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
Oct 19, 2007, 8:11 PM
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: California, USA
Posts: 583
|
I went from a *ist DL to a K100D. The first thing I immediately noticed was the AF was much more responsive. I never used AF.C on the *istDL, but it is usually spot-on with my K100D. Granted, I mainly use center-spot focusing.
- Jason |
|
|
|
|
Oct 20, 2007, 8:08 AM
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 305
|
I also agree with Jason. I had the chance to sell my DL and buy the k100d for almost nothing.
Autofocus definitely seems a little quicker and more accurate. Fred |
|
|
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 8:56 PM.
