|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 4
|
![]()
My DL has given inconsistent performance with continuous autofocus while shooting my sons' soccer games. Is the continuous autofocus system on the K100D more responsive and consistent? Thanks.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links |
|
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: California, USA
Posts: 583
|
![]()
I went from a *ist DL to a K100D. The first thing I immediately noticed was the AF was much more responsive. I never used AF.C on the *istDL, but it is usually spot-on with my K100D. Granted, I mainly use center-spot focusing.
- Jason |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 305
|
![]()
I also agree with Jason. I had the chance to sell my DL and buy the k100d for almost nothing.
Autofocus definitely seems a little quicker and more accurate. Fred |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|