Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital SLR and Interchangeable Lens Cameras > Pentax / Samsung dSLR, K Mount Mirrorless

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Sep 9, 2006, 6:05 PM   #11
Senior Member
ennacac's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,198

You could use two crossed sticks like the Mountain Men use to do when shooting Buffalo, but short of that I find a monopod very useful in the field. It is much better than nothing at all and far less bulky than a tripod.

By the way, I also find nothing wrong with the frog photo, in fact it is very nice and sharp.

ennacac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 9, 2006, 6:27 PM   #12
Senior Member
NonEntity1's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lake Placid Florida USA
Posts: 2,689

First of all, I love the frog shot. He looks almost like he is made of green anodized aluminum, just excellent. Secondly, in regards to shooting sticks, they are still a popular shooting accessory. The only problem I could see with using them would be the sticks gripping the lens and preventing the use of the focus and zoom controls.

NonEntity1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 9, 2006, 6:40 PM   #13
Posts: n/a

another way i've used is get a flash bracket similar to mine. get a 1/2'' x 5' piece of something stiff and hold that and the grip on bracket in your left hand. the 1/2'' rod is easily adjustable for hieght by just letting it slide thru your hand. i have found this works great for macros.

  Reply With Quote
Old Sep 9, 2006, 7:18 PM   #14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 104

Are you using the monopod correctly? The least steady way is to use a monopod is to hold it vertically.

You'll find that holding the monopod leg out in front leaningthe cameratoward you so that you form a tripod with your two legs acting as the other legs of the tripod is significantly steadier. Not intuitively obvious, but it works.

Larry in Dallas
Heathglen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 9, 2006, 9:42 PM   #15
Senior Member
Monza76's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,140

Maw Harley wrote:
Ira, which ball head are you going with? I followed the tripod thread and have been checking out the dynatrans but at the budget models at 13 lb /6000 kg (?????), the ball head is a marginal deal, when you start adding the heavier older lenses, IMHO.
I won two heads with extra QR mount plates.http://cgi.ebay.ca/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?...0%3D%26fvi%3D1 One is a tilt pan head, the other is a ball head. I only plan to use the ball head on a monopod where it will allow some motion but doesn't really have to support the camera on its own.

The tilt pan is to replace the quick grip ball head that came with my Dynatran tripod. The quick grip uses a pistol grip which locks and unlocks very quickly, holds reasonably well (I don't have any really heavy lenses) but is difficult to position precisely and to keep level when panning.

The quality may not be up to Bogen/ Manfrotto or Giotto level but they "look" like serviceable heads for my light duty work.

Monza76 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 9, 2006, 10:04 PM   #16
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 12

This may be a little off the subject, but I seem to recall reading in one of the forums about a tripod that had one of the legs that could be separated and used as a monopod. I tried to find it but cannot. Does anyone else remember this or can point me in the right direction. Seems to me getting a tripod with a monopod built it would be a good idea.

Thanks. Len
lenkerry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 9, 2006, 10:37 PM   #17
Senior Member
snostorm's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Chicago Suburb, IL, USA
Posts: 2,770

Hi Len,

That would probably be the Cullman Magic 2:


I can't personally vouch for this pod, and think that you could probably do better
getting separates.

But as always, YMMV

snostorm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 9, 2006, 10:49 PM   #18
Senior Member
Maw Harley's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 123

Hi Ira, I have to back up and agree with you about the serviceability (sp?) of equipment other than the bogens/manfrottos and giottos. I always appreciate your perspective and that of the other members of the forum. Afterall I'm only "reading about":sad:it at this point and y'all are putting "it" to use :|. And at this point is is all just theory and the list will evolve when I get that experience with the k100d kit equipment..

Thanks again for the input.

Maw Harley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 10, 2006, 3:00 AM   #19
Senior Member
bilybianca's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Hassleholm, Sweden
Posts: 3,437

nlp239 wrote:
Nothing wrong with that shot but plenty with this one and many like it.

It was meant to be showing the good shots not the bad. Sorry.
OK, now I understand what you mean. Can't you just save your a** by calling it "Impressionistic experiment" ?

bilybianca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 10, 2006, 7:34 AM   #20
Senior Member
nlp239's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 719

bilybianca wrote:
"Impressionistic experiment" ?

OK, from now on all my Out of Focus and Shaky work will be called "Impressionistic Experiments" LOL.

Ira, I was thinking of getting that set BUT it has a 3/8" thread on the tripod side - I have 1/4" NC thread.

Thanks everyone for your suggestions. I was using the m'pod in exactly the same way you are recommending. Actually I was using an angle viewer - not for thefrog -since the monarchs were roosting in the trees above me. In the case of the frogs, I did have the leg further back than my heels - maybe is was too much.

nlp239 is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 8:52 AM.