Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital SLR and Interchangeable Lens Cameras > Pentax / Samsung dSLR, K Mount Mirrorless

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Mar 8, 2007, 3:11 AM   #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 692
Default

Well..If it is so poor, I guess the magazine who will be publishing my 12 page story should be made aware of this...Here is an example of how poor the K10D is...

http://www.pressbook.com/homebook.as...&owner_id=5144
Attached Images
 
benjikan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 8, 2007, 7:50 AM   #12
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Sleepy wrote:
Quote:
Hello Orion,

WOuld you please tell me how much make the 1st photo become the 2nd one??? What are the post processes you did???
I tried to increase the brightness or something else but it was hard for me to get similar result (not even close to it).

Thank you very much.
it's not the brightness setting. it's a levels adjustment.

ben, great shot. i may pm you about another.

roy
  Reply With Quote
Old Mar 8, 2007, 8:43 AM   #13
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 692
Default

Pardon my ignorance but what is "PM" about another mean?

http://www.pressbook.com/homebook.as...&owner_id=5144
http://www.olaphoto.com/zoom/benjamin-kanarek.php
Attached Images
 
benjikan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 8, 2007, 1:12 PM   #14
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 42
Default

benjikan wrote:
Quote:
Pardon my ignorance but what is "PM" about another mean?

"PM" = "private message". Not sure what "about another" means. ;-)

Will
Polytrope is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 8, 2007, 1:33 PM   #15
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 42
Default

I'm quite happy with the K10D. Here's a picture I took very quickly the other day of a duck at the lake. Shot Raw (PEF). Very slightly post-processed in Lightroom with the tone curve to expand the contrast, but basically, this is pretty close to the image as it came from the camera. Hand held, but when the picture is enlarged, the tiny drops of water on the duck's back are nice and sharp. Exposure also seems to me to be quite satisfactory, in line with my expectations.

Will
Polytrope is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 8, 2007, 5:22 PM   #16
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 8
Default

Hello Orion,

WOuld you please tell me how much make the 1st photo become the 2nd one??? What are the post processes you did???
I tried to increase the brightness or something else but it was hard for me to get similar result (not even close to it).

Thank you very much.


[line]

:idea:

IApplied some Levels Processing in Adobe PhotoShop Elements 3 and then Applied some Contast,Gamma & Sharpening in FastStone Image Viewer beta-3.

You should be able to get similiar results using the same processing techniquesin PhotoShop.

Cheers,

Orion :|



OrionM is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 1:42 PM.