Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital SLR and Interchangeable Lens Cameras > Pentax / Samsung dSLR, K Mount Mirrorless

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Feb 4, 2007, 4:59 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Essex, UK
Posts: 1,868
Default

I know most don't like mirror lenses, but I am in favour of them, as they keep the size/weight down, while giving you a good reach.


Or so I thought:

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.d...6402%26fvi%3D1

Is this the fattest mirror lens?

Bit outside my price range but someone might like it.


Darren
Dal1970 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Feb 4, 2007, 6:11 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
bluwing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 592
Default

Hi Darren,

Mirror lenses are nice for the size and weight advantage. That one is quite fast for its reach. There is a Sigma 400mm on eBay that is a lot newer and is f5.6. They are usually a constant of f8. There was a Pentax mirror lens just on eBay that was not seen to often, It was a zoom lens. Its fstop was f8 to f12 and 400mm to 600mm.

You can get some nice images from them, But you also get a ring bokeh.

Rudy
bluwing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 4, 2007, 7:11 PM   #3
TDN
Senior Member
 
TDN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,288
Default

man. how would you ever manage to manually focus that thing in the field?

I think that one's suitable for moon shots, and stills with a background without too much details... and that about covers it.

sure would be impressive to carry that around though
TDN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 4, 2007, 10:16 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
ishino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 661
Default

Oh my gosh check out that thing! I suddenly feel so inadequate! lol!!
ishino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 5, 2007, 7:32 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
rhermans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Antwerp - Belgium
Posts: 3,454
Default

It's the fastest I've seen but a tiny bit to large for my taste.
IMHO , I don't think that there is not a real size/weight benefit.

BUT IMPRESSIVE in any way

Ronny


rhermans is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 5, 2007, 10:28 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,396
Default

The mirrors do give you a lot of reach for very little cash outlay, and they do need the use of a tripod :-)

The drawbacks are:
the constant aperture f/4 in this case, there is not much depth of field at 500mm and f/4 :-)

Manual focus only.

Filters normally drop into the rear of the mirror lens so you need to keep taking it off to change them if you plan to use filters.

Mirrors turn all specular highlights into donuts, which is not bad but can get annoying after a while :idea:
PeterP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 5, 2007, 12:29 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
snostorm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Chicago Suburb, IL, USA
Posts: 2,770
Default

Hi Darren,

I like fast and long. . . but it has to be practical, and 6.5 lbs ain't that IMO. It would be interesting to see if it's sharp enough to use a good 2x TC for 1000mm f8. . .:-)

Scott
snostorm is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 4:43 AM.