Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital SLR and Interchangeable Lens Cameras > Pentax / Samsung dSLR, K Mount Mirrorless

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Jul 2, 2007, 3:36 AM   #1
Senior Member
 
Alex 007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ariel/Israel
Posts: 1,177
Default

Hello my dear Pentax K10D owners & future owners or fans!

Today I decided to "Try" the 1600 ISO issue + as always I PP with my Neat Image "Demo" free software + cropping after so trough my Picasa 2.7 photo organizer.

I use "P" setting, "Spot" light meter....more information...sorry I forgot it!

Trust that you will be not disappointed!:?

As always...any critic is heart fully welcomed!:idea:

Peace,

Alex 007:|
Attached Images
 
Alex 007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Jul 2, 2007, 3:43 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
Alex 007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ariel/Israel
Posts: 1,177
Default

Another One!

Peace,

Alex 007:|
Attached Images
 
Alex 007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 2, 2007, 3:45 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
Alex 007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ariel/Israel
Posts: 1,177
Default

Last one!

Peace,

Alex 007:|
Attached Images
 
Alex 007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 2, 2007, 6:13 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
robar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: D/FW area Texas
Posts: 7,590
Default

#2 gets my vote

roy
robar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 2, 2007, 6:34 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
CyberCoyote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 257
Default

#2 gets vote #2, too. I'd never had assumed ISO 1600 if you'd not said they were. Good technique plus pp!
CyberCoyote is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 2, 2007, 8:05 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
mtngal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Frazier Park, CA
Posts: 16,052
Default

#2 is my kind of shot, too. Well done with the pp - I use Neat Image too and have been very pleased with the results most of the time.
mtngal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 2, 2007, 8:28 AM   #7
Senior Member
 
Alex 007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ariel/Israel
Posts: 1,177
Default

Ok...my dear Folks!

Same #:2...but with a little more back leaves detail!

Thanks a lot for your honestly!

Peace,

Alex 007:|
Attached Images
 
Alex 007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 2, 2007, 9:58 AM   #8
Senior Member
 
CyberCoyote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 257
Default

I still like the first version the best, Alex. Without the other details it makes be believe it could be the leaf of some rare plant deep in a rainforest, the tiny bit of light slipping through the canopy illuminating a lone spot. The noise is also more apparant in the brighter version distracting from the overall composition.
CyberCoyote is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 2, 2007, 10:07 AM   #9
Senior Member
 
Alex 007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ariel/Israel
Posts: 1,177
Default

CyberCoyote wrote:
Quote:
I still like the first version the best, Alex. Without the other details it makes be believe it could be the leaf of some rare plant deep in a rainforest, the tiny bit of light slipping through the canopy illuminating a lone spot. The noise is also more apparant in the brighter version distracting from the overall composition.
Yes I also agree with you!...Bravo!!!

Peace,

Alex 007:|
Alex 007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 2, 2007, 9:29 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
mtngal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Frazier Park, CA
Posts: 16,052
Default

Definitely prefer the original #2. It's the dark hints of other leaves with the oneso brightthat I love (like high contrast pictures).
mtngal is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 2:38 PM.