Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital SLR and Interchangeable Lens Cameras > Pentax / Samsung dSLR, K Mount Mirrorless

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Dec 13, 2007, 10:19 AM   #1
Senior Member
jeffm's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 109

I just learned that I will be a grandfather next year. I have a K10d and will need a low light portrait lens. I'm considering the Sigma 70mm f/2.8 Macro. Does anyone have any experience with this lens? Any other suggestions? Please help. Thanks.
jeffm is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Dec 13, 2007, 10:50 AM   #2
Senior Member
Keithw's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Posts: 421

jeffm wrote:
I just learned that I will be a grandfather next year.

Something that might be worth considering is a 50mm f1.7 lens. On the K10D it becomes a superfast 75mm SLR equivalent. Could be useful for those low-light pics where you don't want to use flash.

That said, what do I know - I keep getting outbid on ebay!

Keithw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 13, 2007, 12:15 PM   #3
Senior Member
jeffm's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 109

Thanks for the input.
jeffm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 13, 2007, 1:38 PM   #4
Senior Member
Illuminati's Avatar
Join Date: May 2006
Location: California, USA
Posts: 583

It might be a little difficult to use 70mm indoors. You might want to consider the 50mm f/1.4. If you have a bit more money to spend, you could go a bit wider and get the 43mm f/1.9 limited.

I have used the 50mm f/1.4, and find it's just about the right length to photograph my niece.

- Jason
Attached Images
Illuminati is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 13, 2007, 1:43 PM   #5
Senior Member
Monza76's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,140

My vote is the 50mm f1.4, I have the FA version and it is a superb low light lens (and a short tele on a DSLR).

Monza76 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 13, 2007, 3:36 PM   #6
Senior Member
snostorm's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Chicago Suburb, IL, USA
Posts: 2,770

Hi Jeff,

The Sigma 70 macro is a very new lens, and I don't know if you'll find a lot of first hand experience with it. As tested, it appears to be a very sharp lens, and with the focus limiter, it would probably be a great lens, but I think that I'd find it limiting in framing versatility.

70mm has an equivalent FOV (Field of View) of a 105mm in 35mm film terms. This is a medium telephoto/portrait length that might be very good for head and bust type shots of adults, and whole body shots for babies, but you'd have to be about 4-6 feet away to get these. It might be difficult to get shots of the parents holding the baby in a smallish room.

The fast 50s will give you 1-1.5 stops for low light shooting and will cost you considerably less, but suffer from the same framing versatility, being a prime. There are also known focusing issues with very fast lenses that have been addressed by both C and N in their newest pro level bodies. Good high ISO performance can pretty much eliminate the speed advantage, and the focusing issues might not be enough to eliminate them from consideration though, IMO.

As I get on in years, "zooming with your feet", while a nice "purist" notion, has become increasingly less practical. My recommendation would be a fast 28-70 zoom. The choices are (in AF lenses), the Tamron 28-75 f2.8 XR Di, the Sigma 28-70 f2.8 EX, the Tokina 28-70 f2.6-2.8 AT-X Pro or Pro II, and last but not least, the Pentax FA* 28-70 f2.8. All, except for the Pentax, are in the same price range as the Sigma 70 Macro, and all are excellent performers.

I personally chose the Tamron (my first AF lens purchase after getting the kit lens with my DS). This is my go-to lens for people, from full-length to head shots, and the focal length range is a favorite of event and wedding photographers, with good reason.

Since you have some time before your grandchild makes an appearance, I'd spend some time experimenting with different focal lengths keeping possible scenarios of shooting the baby and parents in mind. You can also experiment with the camera's flash to see if it will give you the results that you want. If you want versatility in lighting, you might consider getting an external flash, and possibly some good flash modifiers (bounce and diffusers). IMO, experience is the most important element to good photography, and digital allows us to gain that experience at virtually no cost. It's much better to waste a lot of digital frames preparing in advance of an important event than to waste time and priceless moments figuring it out when it really counts. Anyone can get good snaps with just about any camera nowadays, but I would much prefer to capture lifelong memories with images that I can be proud of.

Congrats on the news of your grandchild. It'll be great to be able to offer your family a photographic record of the early years as I'm sure that they will have their hands full just adjusting to being new parents.

Just my $.02 worth (and maybe a couple more. . . :-) )

snostorm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 13, 2007, 4:20 PM   #7
Senior Member
jeffm's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 109

Thank you all for your wonderful and informative input. It's nice to know that there is a means to obtain valuable, bias free info on photo equipment.
- Jeff

jeffm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 13, 2007, 7:47 PM   #8
Senior Member
robar's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: D/FW area Texas
Posts: 7,590

30 year old M50/1.4, no IS on the DS, handheld. a birthday sequence in a dim restaurant.

robar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 13, 2007, 9:34 PM   #9
Senior Member
Black Knight's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Oxford, CT
Posts: 1,309

Hi jeffm

I'll have To agree that the 50mm f1.4 is a great lense. I have not only the FA , but i also have the M Version.
Another possibility might Be the Pentax 35MM F2.0 . Never Owned one, but I have heard good things about it.


Black Knight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 14, 2007, 12:46 AM   #10
Senior Member
DMJJR's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 933

Newborns have very sensitive eyes-my newest grandchild is 13 days old. Took this last nite-DS with DA 40 2.8 ISO 1600 WB=tungsten-hand held.
DMJJR is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 2:01 PM.