Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital SLR and Interchangeable Lens Cameras > Pentax / Samsung dSLR, K Mount Mirrorless

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Jul 25, 2008, 10:59 AM   #1
Senior Member
 
danielchtong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,890
Default






The cropped one?

I just did not have enough light to get both in focus. Otherwise the full image would have been impressive



Daniel
danielchtong is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Jul 25, 2008, 11:28 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
bigdawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Thach Alabama
Posts: 14,981
Default

No. 2. Gives a view like I was there myself!

Dawg

bigdawg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 25, 2008, 11:39 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
thekman620's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 6,084
Default

I like #2, as it shows a perceived reason for the uproar. Great shot Daniel!...cheers...Don
thekman620 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 25, 2008, 11:47 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
rhermans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Antwerp - Belgium
Posts: 3,454
Default

First sight nr1, but that is because the duck is bigger.
nr2 a bit larger would be better, but then I would crop that one a bit on te left side so the duck isn't that much in the center.

seems that I haven't given an answer :blah:

great shot however.
rhermans is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 25, 2008, 12:14 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
bilybianca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Hassleholm, Sweden
Posts: 3,435
Default

Going forth and back I think I finally set for #1, leaving to the imagination what onearth the duck is upset about.

Kjell
bilybianca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 25, 2008, 4:25 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
danielchtong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,890
Default

Don, Ed, rhermans Kjell

Thank for giving the input. Shooting birds sometimes you never know what you may come up with . Also I was playing around with shooting at almost water/low level. Seeing things from that angle is different. I was used to shooting from low angle only with a FE. This is different

Daniel
danielchtong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 25, 2008, 7:01 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
Goldwinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Winter Haven, Florida
Posts: 6,515
Default

I like em both Dan.
i really like the low angle!

Goldwinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 25, 2008, 7:45 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
snostorm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Chicago Suburb, IL, USA
Posts: 2,770
Default

Hi Daniel,

I too like the low angle. I've been trying for that more this year. I also like #1 better. It may only be prejudice, but I really try to not have extraneous parts of bodies except for some unusual circumstances were it seems to work. . .

Scott
snostorm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 26, 2008, 1:08 AM   #9
Senior Member
 
Lyrics51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Northwest Ohio
Posts: 1,954
Default

Good work, Daniel. I like #1 because of the closeness of the subject, but I also like #2 because, as has already been said, it gives some context.

Glenn
Lyrics51 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 26, 2008, 6:05 AM   #10
Senior Member
 
danielchtong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,890
Default

Lyrics51 wrote:
Quote:
Good work, Daniel.* I like #1 because of the closeness of the subject, but I also like #2 because, as has already been said, it gives some context.*

Glenn
Goldwinger, Scott & Glenn

Thanks again for the input



I have been playing around with several image of the low-angle perspective. This one came out with a strange glow on the duck.


Daniel
danielchtong is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 1:55 PM.