Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital SLR and Interchangeable Lens Cameras > Pentax / Samsung dSLR, K Mount Mirrorless

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Jun 13, 2009, 11:03 AM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 9
Default Settings Question

Just curious what all of you set your K20 to when shooting JPEG's do you use the 14 megapixel setting or do you lower it to 10? what quality as it the stars? I was just curious and thought I would ask. I currently have my set to the 14 with one down from the top on the quality and was just curious what others have theirs set on.

photographynut
photographynut is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Jun 13, 2009, 11:21 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
Trojansoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Hot Springs, AR
Posts: 3,723
Default

I always use the 14.6 MP setting and highest quality for JPG's. Lately, I have been shooting more and more with the JPEG+ setting and DNG format for RAW processing.

The only time I would consider lowering the quality would be if I were restricted by being nearly out of memory card space, or if I were shooting so much on high-speed that the camera was having trouble with buffer over-runs. That has not been a problem since I have switched pretty exclusively to 16 MB SanDisk Ultra II memory cards since they save at 15 mps, close to the highest speed the camera will do.

I was using my K10 a couple of days ago in a situation where I was shooting JPEG+ with some high-speed shooting, and I really noticed the difference in the processing speed of the two cameras.

Paul
Trojansoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 13, 2009, 11:42 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
Goldwinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Winter Haven, Florida
Posts: 6,515
Default

I'll second what Paul said.
__________________
GW

Life's a breeze on a Goldwing...
Goldwinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 13, 2009, 12:31 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
mtngal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Frazier Park, CA
Posts: 16,052
Default

I've always used the highest quality and largest size for jpg as a general rule - you can always throw away information/resize down but it's harder to increase quality or upsize files. I always back up my files pretty much every day and memory is pretty cheap now.

P.S. I did use the camera set to 2 mp this past week - I needed to take a picture of something and email it. That's the first time that I felt a need to use less than 14 mp.

Last edited by mtngal; Jun 13, 2009 at 12:35 PM.
mtngal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 13, 2009, 4:23 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
snostorm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Chicago Suburb, IL, USA
Posts: 2,770
Default

Hi ph_nut,

I started out shooting at ****, since it was available, but after comparing these closely with ***, went back to *** compression (which is the default, after all) when I didn't see any significant difference in output quality. I chimp a lot, so write speed (which is inversely proportional to file size) actually makes a difference in my shooting regimen. Using jpegs at higher compression makes the camera just a bit faster, so it helps me get a few more possible shots of my fleeting subjects. . . but YMMV, of course.

Scott
snostorm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 13, 2009, 6:44 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
nhmom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Southern New Hampshire
Posts: 5,202
Default

I had never done a comparison between the quality/size of the different settings. But, keep mine at 14MP and the highest star setting assuming it will give me the most detail to work with if needed in processing.

Patty
nhmom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 13, 2009, 9:35 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
mtngal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Frazier Park, CA
Posts: 16,052
Default

Scott - that's interesting, I may re-think this. It wouldn't be so bad to save a bit of memory/write time if it doesn't affect quality. Write time doesn't really affect me since the only time I take multiple shots is when I'm doing exposure bracketing for HDR, though.
mtngal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 13, 2009, 9:39 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
beachboy2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 517
Default

I always shoot raw.
bb2
beachboy2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 14, 2009, 4:25 AM   #9
Senior Member
 
rhermans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Antwerp - Belgium
Posts: 3,454
Default

I haven't had any reason to switch the size of the images down. So I don't use it.
Also because 99.9% of the time I shoot in raw (dng) the issue doesn't appear.

Ronny
__________________
rhermans is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 8:27 AM.