Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital SLR and Interchangeable Lens Cameras > Pentax / Samsung dSLR, K Mount Mirrorless

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Oct 9, 2011, 12:44 AM   #1
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 589
Default Photozone review if Pentax 18-135 lens

I had just about decided on this lens to take to Italy till I read the review at photozone. They really panned the optical performance. Saying it was not a good lens for architectural work. Well, thats 80% of Italy. What are your thoughts? I really like the fact it's weather resistant, and I love quick shift.

Last edited by tony3dd; Oct 9, 2011 at 12:50 AM.
tony3dd is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Oct 9, 2011, 1:42 AM   #2
Senior Member
Frogfish's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Shanghai, China
Posts: 2,774

The general consensus of the 18-135 is that it's so-so optically (relatively speaking) but if you want and need WR then it's great and saves you paying out lots of 000s for a 16-50 / 50-135 to cover a similar range. Most people feel it is over-priced but again there's little option if you require WR.

I think quite a few people may have mentioned to you on your various threads (both here and at PF) that if you want a high multiplier zoom then there have to be compromises somewhere along the line (quality zooms don't have multipliers of more than x3). All that said as an all-in-one general purpose travel zoom with WR (which from your posts seems to be what you are looking for) it has no equal. Buy a used one and then re-sell it when you return from your trip !
Pentax : 15 Ltd, 77 Ltd, 43/1.9 Ltd, Cosina 55/1.2, DA*300/4, Contax Zeiss Distagon 28/2.8, Raynox 150/250, AFA x1.7, Metz 50 af1.

Nikon : D800, D600, Sigma 500/4.5, Sigma 120-300/2.8, Zeiss Distagon ZF2 - 21/2.8, Zeiss Distagon ZF2 - 35/2.0, Nikkor 85/1.8G, Sigma 50/1.4. Nikon x1.4 TC, Sigma x2.0 TC

Last edited by Frogfish; Oct 9, 2011 at 1:50 AM.
Frogfish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 10, 2011, 11:46 AM   #3
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: East Central Vermont
Posts: 1,890

I have also read the photozone review, and I don't know how to reconcile that review with the high praise the lens received at PF. The PF review said it's a very good lens, notably better than the Pentax kit lens, but not in the same league as the DA* lenses. As Kevin has pointed out, top-notch zoom lenses almost never exceed a 3X zoom range, and the 18-135 has a range of 7.5X. The 18-135 is certainly not perfect, but most reviews (except for photozone) have said it's a fine lens.

If you want absolutely superb image quality, get some prime limited lenses or a few DA* zooms. They're very expensive and will weigh down your camera bag considerably. If you want to travel light, the 18-135 is probably a good choice, despite it less than world class optics. I shoot mostly with zooms of intermediate quality, and while I would like some top notch lenses, I'm happy with what I have. But I do have one very fine lens: the FA 50mm f/1.4, which is lightweight, small, and sharp as a tack. When I want a very shallow depth of field, or razor sharpness, I use that lens, and zoom with my feet.
mtnman is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:43 AM.