Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital SLR and Interchangeable Lens Cameras > Pentax / Samsung dSLR, K Mount Mirrorless

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Jul 27, 2006, 11:04 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3
Default

I have a Pentax istD with a standard 18 - 55mm lens. After reading through some posts I gathered that a really good prime lens would be a smc A Pentax 50mm 1.7. This would be much sharper than my standard lens in addition to having better colour. So, off to eBay I go to get this lens. It arrives in good condition, but the photos are not as sharp as my standard lens and the colours are not as vibrant. I only shoot in raw. On the suface I can find nothing wrong with the 50mm lens. Do older Pentax lenses loose their quality over time. Disappointed.
mrtarzan is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Jul 27, 2006, 11:17 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
ennacac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,198
Default

This was taken with my 50mm f/1.7, ISO 400, jpg



Tom
ennacac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 27, 2006, 11:28 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Peacekeeper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,024
Default

I am at a loss :?


I have a 50 f1.7 and a 55 f1.8 and both are unbelievably sharp. Actually every second hand prime lens I have bought including 135/f2.8 and 17/f3.5 are sharper than my kit lens.

I presume your lens is AF, have you tried switching over to MF (focus it yourself) and also dropping your aperture down a setting or two. Not may lenses are their sharpeest wide open.

Maybe you could set your camera on a tripod and take two shots of the same scene with the same settings using both lenses and post up here so we can have a look?

Crash
Peacekeeper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 27, 2006, 11:46 PM   #4
Member
 
brasher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 37
Default

Use f/2.8 to f/8 and It will show it's true strength's.

1.7 is a last resort I have found.
brasher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 28, 2006, 12:13 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
mtngal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Frazier Park, CA
Posts: 16,056
Default

I've found thatmy M50mm 1.7 (purchased in 1980)is sharper at 1.7 than the M50mm 1.4 at 1.4 (which is quite soft), however at f8 both are really sharp. I posted a comparison photo and there wasn't much difference between these 2 lenses- the 1.4 seemed to have a bit more color. I haven't actually comparedthem to the kit lens or the 50-200.
mtngal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 28, 2006, 1:03 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
philneast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Hobart Tasmania
Posts: 489
Default

I used Pentax-M 28mm f2.8 SMC to take the picture in this recent thread.

I bought this lens new in the early 1980's so it has not aged too badly

http://www.stevesforums.com/forums/v...mp;forum_id=80
philneast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 28, 2006, 8:15 AM   #7
TDN
Senior Member
 
TDN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,288
Default

Check your diopter adjustment. It might be that you're just not focusing the right way.

I doubt that a mint 50mm 1.7 Pentax lens would be soft...

TDN
TDN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 28, 2006, 8:25 AM   #8
Senior Member
 
Monza76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,095
Default

Even wide open in poor light the old M-series 50mm f1.7 shines. Here is a shot taken wide open at 1/60 sec under one 60W incandescent lamp (the background is Christmas tree lights). Since it was shot at ISO 1600 it is a little "grainy" but I like that in a B&W.

Ira
Attached Images
 
Monza76 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 2:39 PM.