Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Post Your Photos > People Photos

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Jan 23, 2005, 11:03 PM   #1
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

  Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Jan 24, 2005, 12:27 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
kadok6330's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 480
Default

Looks more 40D to me:-)
kadok6330 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 24, 2005, 12:55 AM   #3
Member
 
bishopprice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 35
Default

ok. I just have to respond. She has to be absolutely the most beautiful woman I have ever seen! I love every photo you have ever posted of her! I'm sure she looks like every other woman when she isn't all made up and stuff, but i just can't see that. It just looks like she is one of those few women that just wake up perfect..... or at least its nice to think that when looking at these great shots. And she also has a sweet look to her. Not trashy or anything like other models on here.

I think we are all:lovever this model.
bishopprice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 24, 2005, 4:55 AM   #4
Moderator
 
Frank Doorhof's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,320
Default

Somehow I would have her hold her head straight.
But than again it's Jess .
Frank Doorhof is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 24, 2005, 3:11 PM   #5
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Actually 38D...is this better Frank?



BTW...she read your comments bishopprice & thought they were quite nice!
  Reply With Quote
Old Jan 24, 2005, 4:41 PM   #6
Moderator
 
Frank Doorhof's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,320
Default

Oh man, is this better grrrr.
Frank Doorhof is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 24, 2005, 4:48 PM   #7
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Thanks Frank! Maybe you can help me with this too! I have another problem deciding which image is the better of these two...





Same image, added a white desaturation in PShop...2nd converted to B&W.

2005:01:23 14:45:07
26mm
39mm (in 35mm film)
1/6 sec, f/11
Mode: Manual
Metering: Multi-segment
ISO: 100
White balance: Auto
Flash: Off
File size: 136KB
Image size: 426 x 640
Saturation: Normal
Sharpness: Normal
Contrast: Normal
  Reply With Quote
Old Jan 24, 2005, 5:09 PM   #8
NHL
Senior Member
 
NHL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 39.18776, -77.311353333333
Posts: 11,547
Default

I have to say: Minolta works well for you... but do you have to push IT???

1/6s again - handheld I presume? :-) :lol: :G
NHL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 24, 2005, 5:13 PM   #9
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

NHL wrote:
Quote:
I have to say: Minolta works well for you... but do you have to push IT???

1/6s again - handheld I presume? :-) :lol: :G
Yep...standing on one leg too ;-)
  Reply With Quote
Old Jan 24, 2005, 6:07 PM   #10
Member
 
bishopprice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 35
Default

You know what else is incredible about her. She obviously has a great physical appearance ( no guy alive would question that), but no matter what pose she is in or how much or little of her body she is showing the first thing i always notice are those eyes!

BTW - I think i like the b&w one better than the color on the last two. She seems to stand out more against the rails in the b&w one to me than in the color. In the color the rails tend to distract me a little. (I know that's absurd! Rails distracting me in a pic of Jess!)
bishopprice is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 8:43 AM.