|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 723
|
![]()
i know i'm only supposed to post one pic but these are practically the same thing, so here i go, i'm risking gettin a virtual smack on the wrist...
![]() ![]() ok ok i know this one is WAY blown out but i was going for a glamour shot and i guess i over did it with the diffuse glow. either way aside from that let me know what you think of these two edits. -mike j- www.pbase.com/mikej86 |
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links |
|
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,451
|
![]()
Sort of washed out. I like the first one better but it is still harsh light for a glamor shot.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Super Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 9,046
|
![]()
its too much... and you need to unmask around the eyes and lips, etc.. to bring back details.. so do you high key on an adjustment layer and then using a black brush paint back the sharpness around the eyes, lips, chin, eyebrows, etc..
good luck and look forward to seeing what you come up with.. ---------- dustin www.hardwickphotos.com |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Super Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,599
|
![]()
Just FYI "glamour" in the UK means partially naked, bikini at least and probably topless. :-) (Imagine my disappointment.)
The lighting is pretty harsh and unflattering so I think the higher-key one actually works better. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,568
|
![]()
peripatetic wrote:
Quote:
really???????? have u taken any glamourous shots u wanna share :roll: |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|