|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 466
|
![]()
I know the sharpness isn't quite there in the tree but on this one I think the building to the left works as a point of interest here, whereas it would definitely be better without it in the previous picture I posted.
Any critiques / suggestions? Thanks |
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links |
|
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 466
|
![]()
Woah the saturation seems more extreme on the web than in photoshop. Here's a reduced one.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 6,915
|
![]()
i like the first one better, even with the greater saturation. as for the building, it would actually look better to me without it entirely. that's just my opinion, though...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 570
|
![]()
I second the no building vote. It not an interesting enough outline to be of interest in
silhouette form. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 115
|
![]()
I love the heavy saturation in the first, but the sun is just too washed around the edges... maybe if you could blend the two you'd get a better result.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|