|
|||||||
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Dec 21, 2005, 11:57 PM
|
#11 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,940
|
Dustin, today you have opted to sound mysterious?
|
|
|
|
Dec 22, 2005, 9:29 PM
|
#12 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Bakersfield, CA
Posts: 851
|
Have to be honest here. This looks like a botched macro attempt and even something that could be done without any type of lens attachment or PS.
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 22, 2005, 10:16 PM
|
#13 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 723
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 22, 2005, 10:16 PM
|
#14 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 723
|
lol. widowmaker i know you hate the lensbaby so i think it's cool if you leave that out of your future posts.
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 23, 2005, 12:33 AM
|
#15 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Bakersfield, CA
Posts: 851
|
No I certainly don't hate the lensbaby. I have not been overly impressed with any of the results. This one just does not even have the appearance of being taken with the lensbaby. It looks more like really shallow DOF and what was suppose to be in focus was motion blurred.
I think Dustins idea of two eyes and a pano crop might demonstrate better. |
|
|
|
|
Dec 23, 2005, 8:14 PM
|
#16 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17
|
thats the first time ive seen shadows of lashes on the cornea. the pattern looks cool
|
|
|
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 9:42 AM.
