|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#11 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,724
|
![]()
aladyforty wrote:
Quote:
My mea culpa on that is, I am trying to learn how to do female portraits, and I do sit up and take notice when someone posts this category. Overall appeal I suppose catches my eye more than technical perfection. I like to learn from the experts as much as possible, but sadly, I draw a blank looking at males portraits. By talking the talk critiqueing posts I take a keen interest in I am reasonably sure that Rodney can "walk the walk" when it comes to posting pics that have all the refinements missing in the ones he comments on. How else will us newbs really understand what he means when he lists a list of reasons why a picture is ruined because of these flaws? I agree you guys...uh...girls should get some eye candy too. Rodney was kind enough to post a female type portraitfor me, and I intend to have a good look at it, apply my critique to it, compare it to others on this site, in the same category and prove to myself that this guy CAN walk the walk and isn't just making a lot of technical sounding noise. It's part of my ongoing education in this fascinating hobby.I must learn!Best regards, KennethD |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,964
|
![]()
I can see your point there. As much as I enjoy the male photos one has to admit that the female form is more photogenic.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 966
|
![]()
aladyforty wrote:
Quote:
Rodney |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|