|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 966
|
![]()
KENNETHD wrote:
Quote:
While I do not believe my above statement, I thought I'd share the kind of opposition I would have received from Ken if I had dared to make the same suggestions. I tend to stick to the compositon as is rather than attempting post fix-ups. The tree is a good example of what the photographer never sees when shooting a scene because our brains tune it out because it is not interesting or is a distraction. Following the goose a few frames further would have prevented capturing the tree. Also, if your camera offers continuous shooting then shooting several frames may have done the trick. There is a cyan color cast to the edited version. Rodney |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 40
|
![]()
Thanks KennethD and Rodney. Rodney, I have to agree with you. I think when KennethD took out the tree and the tracks the picture became sterile to me. Also, you're right I never saw the tree and when I saw the picture I was surprised it was there! I like the composition as is. Thank you all for your comments.
Djazz |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|