|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 220
|
![]()
I like the comparision and framing of young versus old but it needed something!!!
|
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links |
|
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Taylor Mill, Kentucky
Posts: 2,398
|
![]()
I'm not sure I get the meaning as I don't see the young versus old comparison. I'm not sure that any amount of post work will help get that across. Artistically, this image doesn't do much for me....just a shot of backsides.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Taylor Mill, Kentucky
Posts: 2,398
|
![]()
double post
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 6,915
|
![]()
i suppose it's a nice study in backsides, but it just doesn't work for me... there really is nothing to indicate where the "young vs old" comparison comes from. i assume the figure in the middle is the young one, but there's nothing to show that.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Super Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 9,046
|
![]()
i agree.. we need more context for a study in young/vs/old.. so i think its just too tight of crop.. i would rather see the whole subjects..
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 723
|
![]()
how about a comparison between pants and no pants....
ya i could do some great critiquing on some cheek shots... lol |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Super Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 9,046
|
![]()
johnsonM86 wrote:
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 723
|
![]()
almost not anymore man.... 20 in december.
so slack off on the teenager bit, its not like you weren't one once... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Super Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 9,046
|
![]()
hehe.. couldnt resist mike.....
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|