Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Post Your Photos > Photo Critiques

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Sep 11, 2010, 12:17 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
guillermovilas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hasselt , Belgium
Posts: 794
Default Which Effect do you prefer ???

The Original


1.


2.


3.


4.
__________________
PENTAX K3
Pentax 35mm f/2.4 AL SMC DA
Pentax 10-17mm f/3.5-4.5 ED IF SMC P-DA Fish-Eye
guillermovilas is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Sep 11, 2010, 12:59 PM   #2
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Mumbai, India
Posts: 84
Default

The original and #3.

Last edited by Subhs; Sep 12, 2010 at 12:17 AM.
Subhs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 11, 2010, 2:51 PM   #3
Super Moderator
 
Hards80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 9,046
Default

I much prefer the original myself. good skin tones, yet the sky and flower are still plenty saturated.
__________________
MyFlickr
Hards80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 11, 2010, 4:03 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Wingman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Hebron, Kentucky (northern Kentucky/Greater Cincinnati):KCVG
Posts: 4,322
Default

#1 for me.
Wingman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 11, 2010, 4:06 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 636
Default

Yeah....the original. Her blouse pretty much steals the color in the composition. You could try bringing up the green and yellow a few degrees, without giving her skin an over-saturated look.
eddie haskell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 11, 2010, 7:48 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
Bynx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 8,585
Default

Put me down for 3 and 5 for me.
Bynx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 11, 2010, 8:52 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
Ordo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: BsAs
Posts: 3,452
Default

Original.
Ordo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 11, 2010, 11:54 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 500
Default

I would categorize all the variants off the original as a attempt at achieving a posterized look. Numbers 2 & 4 appear to just be lesser forms (intensities?) of the applied effect on the original. However, ordinarily 2 & 4 are considered too washed out. The basis is to ask which of the available choices would you expect to be selected for presentation in a magazine? In general, selected photos will need to have some "bite" to them to be considered sufficiently interesting.

In the world of music, the analogy would be "lacks sufficient dynamic range".

Last edited by sdromel; Sep 11, 2010 at 11:57 PM. Reason: Typos
sdromel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 12, 2010, 10:41 AM   #9
Senior Member
 
iowa_jim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: North Central Iowa
Posts: 589
Default

I like the first shot. I occassionally use the more agressive filters to pull detail into view, but mostly not.
iowa_jim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 12, 2010, 12:43 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
condorman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Cornwall England and Gorges du Lot France
Posts: 1,019
Default

Numero Uno for meeeee.
__________________
or ev waaaaa.

Lumix Fx-01

d5000
condorman is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 1:19 AM.