Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Post Your Photos > Photo Critiques

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Aug 31, 2005, 1:00 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
julies517's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 851
Default

or as you say here, a mono conversion.
Attached Images
 
julies517 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Aug 31, 2005, 2:06 PM   #2
330
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 27
Default

I feel wrapped up in this picture. The folds of the petals continue to undo themselves in the unfocused background. Its stark and beautiful at the same time. Nice.
330 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 31, 2005, 9:11 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,974
Default

Looks like death all around and life still clinging on in the center.

Just my opinion and first impression.

Good contrast and center sharpness.
vIZnquest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 31, 2005, 9:19 PM   #4
Super Moderator
 
Hards80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 9,046
Default

looks pretty good... i agree.. good contrast and its sharp.. the only thing i would do is burn down those hightlights at the top a bit.. they distract from the flower, which is lovely... the mono conversion definately gives this shot a very different feel than your typical rose shot, which i like quite a bit..
Hards80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 31, 2005, 9:23 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
julies517's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 851
Default

thank you for your comments, i appreciate them. i agree that those hot spots need toning down, i use ps elements 2....when i use the burn tool it just gets muddy, do i just need practice or is there another method or software i should be using?
julies517 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 1, 2005, 11:21 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 213
Default

with the burn tool in photoshop cs2(which is what i use) you can lower or raise the exposure, meaning the strength of the brush. using a soft edge brush and a 25-50% exposure/strength always does it for me. this allows for subtle changes, and allows you to go back over and over until you see the gradual change you want.

hope this helps



-jon rowe
jedmag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 1, 2005, 12:20 PM   #7
Super Moderator
 
Hards80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 9,046
Default

yup, i agree.. its better to use a lower intensity and repeat..
Hards80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 1, 2005, 5:59 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
julies517's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 851
Default

i'll give it a try,* when doing this correction should the image be at 100%? - thank you dustin and jon, i appreciate the help.
julies517 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 1, 2005, 7:13 PM   #9
Super Moderator
 
Hards80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 9,046
Default

when doing any corrections just make sure the image is in an even divisable of 100... so 50, 25, 12.5
Hards80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 2, 2005, 11:19 AM   #10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 177
Default

I like it. It looks so sharp, it looks like you could get a paper cut from it. The conversion does look great on it, and I think the fact that maybe the outer edges are dying, it makes it better.
johnsmith is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 3:26 AM.