Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Post Your Photos > Photo Critiques

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Jan 16, 2006, 2:51 AM   #11
Senior Member
 
pj1974's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 2,914
Default

Interesting animal Dustin, I never looked so closely at a mountain yak before! I prefer the first one mainly because the yak looks more separated from the "trees" (the 2nd one I feel a bit like the branch is shooting from it's back). I don't know if it would have looked better with the yak having just sky directly behind it and the tree further to the left of it (so it doesn't "interfere" with it's body). I DO like the round sort of rock / hill thing it's standing on though!

And I'm with Julie, that I prefer the first one's head position (yes these are just subjective things I know). However.... one little thing about the first one is that I can't help but notice the way it stands (compared to the second photo). I have an idea in the back of my mine it's about to have a bowel movement or something.... :roll: Maybe it's just my bias having grown up on a farm.

Still very interesting and well composed shots... Well done (as per usual) Dustin!

regards from Paul
pj1974 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 16, 2006, 5:03 AM   #12
Super Moderator
 
peripatetic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,599
Default

Um, wow.

In the second one he/she? (I find it soooo difficult to tell with Yaks) looks like it might be getting ready to jump.

I prefer the second to the first one, where it looks like it might be getting ready to do something else that rhymes with "jump". :P

So where did you find this Yak?

peripatetic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 16, 2006, 6:18 AM   #13
Senior Member
 
SteveDak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,471
Default

Nice pics Dustin (would we expect anything less?:-))

I'm with Julie & PJ - prefer the first shot for no other reason than it just seems altogether more natural to me. The position of the head gives more character detail and interest. First one is a little too clean / portraitish if you get my drift.

Anyway, Im beginning to yak on a bit - nice shots
SteveDak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 16, 2006, 6:33 AM   #14
Senior Member
 
In search of Syd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,657
Default

I love 'em both! They are so sharp and real. I am very impressed.

Regards,

ISoS
In search of Syd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 16, 2006, 9:16 AM   #15
Senior Member
 
audioedge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 254
Default

both are great pictures dustin, it inspires me to take a day off work and go shoot some digital when i see top pics like these

ps - theres enough 'space' to the right to fit a great caption of some sort lol
audioedge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 17, 2006, 10:53 AM   #16
Senior Member
 
Old Jim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 565
Default

I like #1 Dustin. To me there is a little more detail in the fur. The horns are more upright and stand out better. And I think there is a little less distractionby the background with the trees being a little further to the left. Makes the animal stand out a little more. But then again if I could take this quality of aphotograph my critique might mean a little more. Great shots!


Old Jim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 17, 2006, 11:39 AM   #17
Super Moderator
 
Hards80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 9,046
Default

thanks everyone for all your comments... and i am glad that you enjoyed viewing as i enjoyed taking them and sharing.... and i am always glad to inspire someone to take a day off work.. hehe..
Hards80 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 5:12 PM.