Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Post Your Photos > Photo Critiques

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Apr 16, 2006, 1:01 AM   #1
Log
Senior Member
 
Log's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 394
Default

worth the space of harddrive or no?
Attached Images
 
Log is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Apr 16, 2006, 1:47 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
JunixRose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 155
Default

I'm not quite sure what the intended focus was in this shot. It seems to be the bark and if that is the case then I think you might want to do some work toning down the blown bits. In CS2 the highlights and shadows would be very useful here. This image could make a nice piece of either a nature series or as a background print in an apartment.
JunixRose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 16, 2006, 1:56 AM   #3
Log
Senior Member
 
Log's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 394
Default

not much time and a little tired but any better?
Attached Images
 
Log is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 16, 2006, 3:02 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
E.S. Crawford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 911
Default

mucho better!


scot
E.S. Crawford is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 17, 2006, 7:30 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
kenmck15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,568
Default

cool shot of texture. i think the dof is a little to shallow in this instance. the far right part is blurry and to me seems distacting. I think maybe a lil more dof and you hve it or maybe cheat and clone out the oof part

style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #000000"ken
kenmck15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 17, 2006, 5:10 PM   #6
Log
Senior Member
 
Log's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 394
Default

any better?
Attached Images
 
Log is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 17, 2006, 6:38 PM   #7
Member
 
JaviZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 80
Default

This time i have to say i'm not able to find something to look at in this picture. Probably 'cos here those barks are really too common or the composition... who knows?
JaviZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 18, 2006, 2:40 AM   #8
Senior Member
 
bahadir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Izmir, Turkey
Posts: 6,263
Default

Log, as it is often suggested here, I'll have to repeat the difficulty of recovering an overexposed shot when compared with the relatively easy process that of an underexposed one. Btw, I suspect if it's an upside down image.
I also find tree barks an appealing subject and feel that your efforts will be paid back richly if you spare some further trouble for them.
bahadir is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 18, 2006, 10:35 PM   #9
Log
Senior Member
 
Log's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 394
Default

bahadir wrote:
Quote:
Btw, I suspect if it's an upside down image.
i dont understand what you mean by this? the picture isnt upside down... its a weeping willow tree in front of water:-)the water is extremely blue looking and i couldnt find out why but i quite liked it...
Log is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 19, 2006, 1:48 AM   #10
Senior Member
 
bahadir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Izmir, Turkey
Posts: 6,263
Default

Thanks for the extra info. Just my fault:angry:
Though being a much stronger possibility, I simply did not consider the blurring image of the tree was a reflection on the water. I would definitely prefer to perceive the image as it is since 'Corn,water and wood' is one of my favourite songs...
Aghh, after all, life is perception, ain't it?
bahadir is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:16 AM.