Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Post Your Photos > Photo Critiques

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old May 1, 2006, 9:27 AM   #1
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 44
Default

well i am NO photographer by any means. But just bought a new camera last week and took family out for a few pictures this weekend. I still have ALOT to lean with the camera, most these are taken in AUTO mode, but did play with a few options... Im not very creative yet on knowing 'what' to take pictures of... but just shot a ton of pictures all day long ... here are a few of my favorites...

i took them in 5.0MP but resized them to fit on this site.... gimme your thoughts please, i could use any and all advice / critizism so i can get better... thanks
Attached Images
 
00bolt is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old May 1, 2006, 9:31 AM   #2
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 44
Default


00bolt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 1, 2006, 9:33 AM   #3
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 44
Default


00bolt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 1, 2006, 9:34 AM   #4
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 44
Default


00bolt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 1, 2006, 9:36 AM   #5
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 44
Default



00bolt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 1, 2006, 9:38 AM   #6
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 44
Default



00bolt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 1, 2006, 9:40 AM   #7
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 44
Default



00bolt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 1, 2006, 9:48 AM   #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,093
Default

The first and thirddon't particularly strike me as interesting. But the second is both well composed and technically easy to get wrong. If you can build on that, you'll be a serious photographer.

I suppose that some folks will dredge up the "rule" of thirds on the second image --supposedly one wants to place the main subject somewhere on theedge of the rectangle that would be formed if you inscribed a tic-tac-toe board onthe image. While that is often a useful framing consideration, the thing that makes it work here is that there is also a reason to look at the other two thirds of the image -- a point often overlooked by those who mindlessly repeat the rule of thirds. Personally, I think that one is better served by learning to "see" what is in thier viewfinder. If it feels balanced and visually interesting, ignore the "rule" and take the shot. If it doesn't, ignore the"rule" and don't take the shot.

I assume that the boy is someone near and dear to you. A shot like this is the sort of thing that you'llvalue for a lifetime. If you can continue to avoid the shots of family membersstaring into the lens and saying, "cheese," you'll become the photographer of record for your clan.

ETA: Ah, you kept going. OK. On the fourth: it seems rather claustrophobic to me. The line of family up the center seems to make the rest of the picture superfluous. It's a lovely setting, and could have made an interesting portrait, but not by placing everyone in a vertical line up the middle. As to the fifth, I cannot imagine why you would want to use black-and-white on a garden shot. For the last, the baby is cute, but you haven't added any "value" in your composition. The fact that everyone loves a baby makes your job as a photographer harder, not easier. You want to (UNOBTRUSIVELY) add interest to an intrinsically interesting subject. In this shot, you have failed to even atempt that as far as I can see. There was a shot that someone posted a little while ago of "grandad" holding a baby. The shot was over grampa's shoulder, and showed the baby looking up with thosecaptivating baby eyes. It worked wonderfully -- the baby was clearly the star, but the photographer had done the job of adding value to the shot without making his "artsiness" the center of attention. Perhaps, if that photog reads this, he could post that shot as an object lesson in compositionfor these kinds of shots.


ETA: Readingover my remarks, they seem harsh. That was not my intention, and I hope that you do not take them as such. I think you show promise as a photographer. For example, your selection of the garden as a setting for the portraits shows thought and appreciationforsuch things. My desire was to emphasize the points to ponder, and in my clumsiness, I guess I failed to adequately communicate the positive. If I have offended, I apologize.





tclune is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 1, 2006, 10:15 AM   #9
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 44
Default

well thanks for your advice, like I said i am no photographer by any means, i really dont know much of anything. I just took camera and snapped pictures. I dont really know any of the rules, tips, tricks, etc... this is my wife and 2 kids and just took pictures of them... but id love to get better, but like i said... this is basically my frist attepts to do anything... we went to local botanical gardens but seems to still be a couple weeks early... so are gonna go again soon, would love to have some good tips/ideas on what to do for next time....
00bolt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 1, 2006, 10:28 AM   #10
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 44
Default



Attached Images
 
00bolt is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:57 AM.