Steve reviews; something missing
I read your reviews of printers and things said on this board and one issue has come to mine form the post "B&W print Epson 2200 vs Canon S9000" in which you state the Epson 2200 does great B&W and the canon S900 stinks" but in both your reviews i failed to see one B&W picture. To me B&W printing should be a staple like text printing in all printer from bottom to top of line. There is no reason a $100 printer should do text better than a printer costing more they should all be the same. Why do you not include B&W pictures in your reviews? It seams to me this is a important issue that many people have when picking a printer unlike myself that has never printed a B&W picture unless it was that was from the start.