From all these threads im reading it seems the general consensus is that the 6000 is only good if you want to do pc free printing.
that just seems crazy..how about better quality photos? Granted the 4000 produces good photos but i gotta think that the 6000 is pushing out better pictures at the price of slightly less text quality otherwise why would Canon even try and market it?
Where are they trying to position a 6 color printer in the printer market if the photos are only marginally better than the 4 color 4000 as is claimed in all these threads?
should i be taking thses claims im reading on here with a grain of salt? How about a good side by side comparison of photo quality between the two leaving out text tests, lcd, etc....