Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums >

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Sep 11, 2006, 3:18 PM   #1
DReborn's Avatar
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 68

i didn't get the t30 cause it was bulkier than the casio exilim s600...is the T50 skinnier than the T30 or is the only diff the touch screen?
DReborn is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Sep 11, 2006, 4:39 PM   #2
JungleKing's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 34

To me, T50 looks about the same size as T30. Speaking of T50, I understand why Sony wants a touchscreen model in N2 but why put a touchscreen in a T-serie model. Personally, I think touchscreens certainly are high tech but I wouldn't want to own a camera with a touchscreen.

You have to wonder what Sony is doing here. T30 is only slightly better as T9. T10 is only slightly better than T9 but slightly worse than T30. And now T50... If people are buying these cams (with Sony prices) Sony is doing a really good job convincing people that newer models are better.

I'm on the market for a party ultracompact but spendin A LOT of time reading about different cams, the Panasonics, the Sonys et cetera et cetera, I came to realize that while especially nowadays manufacturers are marketing ultracompacts as great party cams only cameras like Fuji F30 are for parties, and that's why I'm gonna buy F30. I know I'm gonna be a bit jealous of my friends owning "credit card" cams with OIS and 3" screens but on the other hand I do not have to use flash and my pics will be superior. And it's not like F30 is a brick or anything.
JungleKing is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 6:51 AM.