|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 2
|
![]()
Hi,can anyone tell me the difference between the two cameras?
Pricewise it's about 50 notes,and the size is different,anything else to warrant extra money? Phil ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links |
|
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 734
|
![]()
I'll try................
P10 / P92 metal / Plastic smaller / Larger info-lithium battery / AA batterys hard covered lcd screen / Soft lcd screen Go to Best Buy or Comp USA and take a look and feel for yourself. See if the differences are worth it to you. I like the more durable lcd on the p10 and the metal case I feel is more solid. The info-lithium batter is fantastic and charges in about 3 hours compaired to the Sony AA's 12+ hours using the supplied Sony slow charger. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4
|
![]()
Hello,
Sorry for reviving this old topic but I am facing the same question. I'm doubting between the 2 camera's, the price difference is about 40$. I am inclined to go with the P92 because the little bit bigger size doesn't matter to me, and I prefer AA batteries (I have plenty of rechargeables laying around) The only thing I was wondering is this: On Sony's site I compared the 2 camera's and with the P10 I could find this (which I could not find for the P92): Continuous Auto Focus To maintain accurate focus lock with fast moving subjects, Continuous AF keeps focusing until the moment of exposure. Now is this a print error and is this feature also available on the P92 ? If not, is this really such a great feature (meaning is the tracking of moving subjects bad with the P92) ? Thanks ! Jorn |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|