|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#941 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 659
|
![]()
Tullio wrote:
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#942 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 7,370
|
![]()
Perhaps the word exposure made you think of light:G
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#943 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 66
|
![]()
I'm not sure that H10 is good for street, too big. But the zoom help me!
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#944 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oregon, USA
Posts: 18,143
|
![]()
That is a nice shot justaman. However, it would be more attractive if it were leveled.
Sarah Joyce |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#945 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 7,370
|
![]()
I agree with Sarah on this one. I bought the H3 for my son months ago, primarily because of its size and 10x optical zoom. However, the 37mm WA is a big limitation. I am getting excited about the new Panasonic LX3 because of its WA lens and great high ISO control. If it wasn't for its steep price, I'd have bought one already.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#946 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 66
|
![]()
Thanks Tullio and Sarah, I will tried but I must clone much things...
For me the H10 is a great camera and 38mm is not a problem. But only, the body is too big, I had a T10, very small always in my jeans pocket. I tried a Panasonic TZ5 but I don't like, of course the wide is attractive but distortions are evidence in all shots that I make. High ISO very noise. But I don't know the LX3. I hope that my english is comprehensible. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#947 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 7,370
|
![]()
The LX3 has a 24mm Leica lens BUT with only 2.5x optical zoom. It is definitely a landscape/indoors type of camera. If you shoot animals, then this is not the camera for you because you'd need to get very very close to obtain any type of close-up. This camera is also good for portraits. It's compact (and handsome). It's worth reading some of the reviews.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#948 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oregon, USA
Posts: 18,143
|
![]()
Here is the H-50 at ISO 1250 F 3.2 and 1/10th on the shutter with existing light and no flash. What do you think?
Sarah Joyce |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#949 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 7,370
|
![]()
That's a very clean image for such a high ISO, Sarah. The H50 is a capable camera but I think the FZ28 has better optics.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#950 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oregon, USA
Posts: 18,143
|
![]()
Hi Tullio-
I own both the FZ-28 and the H-50. In low light levels the H-50 hit the focus much faster. The optical quality between the two is very equal. Sarah Joyce |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|