|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#41 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 92
|
![]()
Does the h50 have the carl zeus lense? oops sorry i just found out it does, i can't figure out why so many reviews are mixed on this camera i say its 50/50
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#42 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oregon, USA
Posts: 18,143
|
![]()
Canadian-
I must admit that you have all of us a bit confused. Yes, the Sony H-50 does indeed have a Carl Zeiss lens. Are there any other issues you might have? Sarah Joyce |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#43 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 988
|
![]()
Canadian wrote:
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#44 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oregon, USA
Posts: 18,143
|
![]()
Jack-
Just a quick note about my favorite camera: the Sony H-50. Imaging Resources found that the Control Wheel on the H-50 for the EV compensation was virtually ineffective. I am wondering if that might have been the problem with your Mc Chord photos??? Sarah Joyce |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#45 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 988
|
![]()
mtclimber wrote:
Quote:
It's a bit tricky asthe H50wants to set it for bracket shooting. I managed to set it at -.07 which may be a bit much. You'll see that if you hit properties on my shots. I dunno... as you said my shots looked light? To me they look a tad dark? I admit that the control wheel is a bit tricky to use at times, especially if I'm in a hurry. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#46 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 3
|
![]()
jack55 wrote:
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#47 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 988
|
![]()
RickL66 wrote:
Quote:
That looks about right. Remember the farther away something is, the closer you seem to get, for an example, go outside and shoot at an object that is a ways away and it will really bring it in. I've added no lenses, however on some photo's, I crop the photo some, (anywhere between 10-25%) so that brings it in even closer. With the high pixel count your able to do that. So in a sense, you have a zoom in a zoom. Actually that would be called digital zoom in some cameras. Make sense? That shot your friend took isn't bad at all for hand held as it is pretty sharp for that kind of low light.... the flash couldn'thave reached that far. Use to be a shot like that would be very blurry. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#48 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 3
|
![]()
jack55 wrote:
Quote:
Thanks for the good review! ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#49 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 988
|
![]()
OK... here is an interesting comparison shots. My friend back east in DE that I shot the yellow finches at has the superzoom Kodak Z712 IS digital camera. We shot from the same place on patio. He was sitting down, I'm standing up. He shot his yesterday, I shot mine when I was there two weeks ago from the same spot. Compare and tell me which camera seems to do the best job?
Kodak Z712 IS shot: ![]() Sony DSC-H50 shot: ![]() Kodak Z712 IS shot: ![]() Sony DSC-H50 shot: ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#50 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 3
|
![]()
Amazing! The H50 definitely has clearer pictures and richer colors. I can even see the seeds clearly in your shot.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|