Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital SLR and Interchangeable Lens Cameras > Sony Alpha dSLR / Konica Minolta dSLR, Sony SLT

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Aug 20, 2006, 9:15 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: California
Posts: 2,274
Default

Last weekend my wife and I went on a camping trip to the Sequoia National Forest. Of course I brought my camera to get some pictures.

This enviroment really shows the limits of a digital cameras ability to capture a wide dynamic range of light. It becomes very challenging to get a correctly exposed picture in the forest with all the shadows.

Is one metering mode better than another for these conditions?

Is it better to correctly expose the bright part of the picture and try work the dark areas afterward? What about filters?

Here is a example; First picture, subjects underexposed background good.
Attached Images
 
lomitamike is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Aug 20, 2006, 9:17 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: California
Posts: 2,274
Default

This one girls good background blown out.
Attached Images
 
lomitamike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 20, 2006, 9:46 PM   #3
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Savannah, GA (USA)
Posts: 22,378
Default

Fill Flash if you can get close enough. ;-)

Actually, the conditions there aren't too bad. Most of the shadow areas are still recoverable. Even using a basic tool like Picasa I was able to use the "fill light" feature and bring it up to where I could see the subjects OK without totally blowing the sky (although it was still brighter than it should be, it was still a light blue).

Using more sophisticated tools, selecting desired areas, you could do much better.

I generally expose for the highlights, unless I really don't care about them for what I'm shooting. Then, use the histogram to help out (it will show you shadow and highlight areas where you're losing detail so you can adjust exposure -- depending on what's more important to you).

Shooting in raw can also help out (you can usually get a couple of stops more out of raw using some of the better tools around).

Yes, using a filter is another option. A graduated neutral density filter is one way to go.

Another way is to blend more than one photo using software. Here is one article discussing technique:

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/tu...blending.shtml

JimC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 20, 2006, 11:17 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: California
Posts: 2,274
Default

Thanks Jim.

Fill flash,your right,I should have thought of that.

I really wanted to include the Giant Sequoia tree as a background. So I guess exposing on the highlights and working the shadows afterwords isthe best option.

Lesson! Use fill flash, and you have a better chance of recovering the shadows then blown highlights.


lomitamike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 21, 2006, 8:49 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 101
Default

This just a quick edit butin photoshop you can actually make it into a pretty acceptable picture ... the rule is tho ... try to do it on exposure

belgian pie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 22, 2006, 3:21 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: California
Posts: 2,274
Default

Thanks belgian pie.

Correct exposure is what I always aim for but in landscape shots where the sky is in the background the extremelight (sky) to dark (shadows) range is just too great for the the camera to capture. There you have the flashing in the histrogram.

I don'tuse filters, so fill flash and post processing are my only alternitives for these conditions.

I have not done a comparison using different metering modes but I doubt that it could make much of a difference.


lomitamike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 22, 2006, 9:42 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
meanstreak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,234
Default

JimC wrote:
Quote:
Another way is to blend more than one photo using software. Here is one article discussing technique:

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/tu...blending.shtml

Nice informative site. I think I may try some of those techniques.
meanstreak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 22, 2006, 10:08 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 101
Default

When you post process then use RAW capture, it holds more information than JPEG and you can do pretty nice stuff post processing.
belgian pie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 23, 2006, 3:18 AM   #9
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

As long as your in PShop, you could remove the pole & wires too.....just a thought.
  Reply With Quote
Old Aug 23, 2006, 8:23 AM   #10
Senior Member
 
tmoreau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 477
Default

The best (only) way around this is to compose a scene with lower contrast. Or lower the contrast yourself with flash (or graduated ND filters), but you'd only be able to light up the people not the background.

You could use any metering mode, keep the sky totally out of the frame, hold AEL button, then re-compose. This will give a good exposure of the dark half but will cause the sky to totally blow out.

Or going the other way, set your exposure so the sky (or tops of the trees) is 2 stops bright and let the bottom of the scene fall where it may, then pull it up in photoshop. There is always more shadow detail, highlights are lost foever. However, you lose a ton of data by doing that. HALF of your tonal range is in the brightest stop of the raw file, so if your brightest highligts are 1-stop down from overexposure your only using half of what your raw file is capable of. In other words, the best thing to do is expose it properly in camera.
tmoreau is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 2:01 AM.