Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital Cameras (Point and Shoot) > Sony

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Mar 23, 2004, 3:40 PM   #31
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 34
Default

Yes. Fast object are the only problem FOR ME. You can use SPORT mode for fast object but outdoor when the light is well. And not all the time.
The other is OK for me . And, the color is not very well interprieted (to much yellow) but it is not big problem for me.
Try this link
http://www.ajanovic.s4u.org/test.html
http://www.ajanovic.s4u.org/test2.html
http://www.ajanovic.s4u.org/test3.html

If it does not work try copy/paste adress of these links in your browser. That will work.
Do not think that is quality of the pictures. It is compresed to HI JPEG. But I talk about blur of pictures.
So please comment...
ajan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 23, 2004, 4:25 PM   #32
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 25
Default

Did you shoot using the sport program with the fast shutter?
Did you try to focus the kids first?
skuba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 23, 2004, 5:25 PM   #33
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 34
Default

Yes, I was tryed, but pic is too dark. Look at this:

www.ajanovic.s4u.org/test4.html
or copy/paste in browser
www.ajanovic.s4u.org/test4.JPG


test1, test2 have setings:
ISO 100, F2.8, 1/80 sec.
test 3 have
ISO 100, F2.8, 1/40 sec.

Does prefokus do something better. I press ones to the end and wait to cammera fokus it and get pic.
ajan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 24, 2004, 5:17 PM   #34
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 9
Default

did you use the flash in test4?
If you did and this is the result; then ı have nothing else to say...
It really is too dark.What was the time the pic is taken? (morning,noon,afternoon?)
There is one thing ı dont know and that is iso. What does iso do ; can anyone tell? Would changing the iso make any difference in test 4 ?
I personally believe that in fast shutter speeds, camera needs lots of light;and if there isnt, then there's nothing the camera can do,whether it's a sony or a canon or a kodak...Am I wrong??
efe85 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 25, 2004, 6:37 PM   #35
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 34
Default

It is without flash, but it was taken about 17,00. It was still a day.
Even if I use flash it is to far for flash to catch.
ISO ? I do not know.
ajan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 26, 2004, 3:43 PM   #36
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 57
Default

Quote:
ISO ? I do not know
see exif info of that picture, picture ISO is in.

2 efe85: ISO means sensitivity of CCD.Difference betwen iso 100 and 200 is such difference in sensitivity that can be compensate by one F number or half/twice s. speed.

F.e.:

ISO100 + F5,6 + 1/30s = ISO200 + F5,6 + 1/60s=ISO100+ F4 +1/60s = ISO 100 + F2,8 +1/120s= ISO400 +F5,6 + 1/120s......

But higher ISO produces much more Digital noise, especially this P series , ISO 400 is useless :evil:
Marek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 29, 2004, 12:28 PM   #37
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 9
Default

thanks Marek for the answer.
Most probably ı will go for the canon a 80.
by the way ; is there anybody who knows why there isn't any canon ixus reviews here at steve's??
efe85 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 30, 2004, 3:07 PM   #38
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 57
Default

They are here, but IXUS trede name for U.S. market is PowerShot S XXX(400,300....).

Marek.
Marek is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:17 PM.