Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums >

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old May 16, 2006, 1:20 PM   #11
TWO2956's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 79


GREAT SHOTS! I'm considering buying the 120-300 2.8 as I have found my 70-200 2.8 is a little short for baseball. I have a d-200 and I hope the sigma lens works as well on it. I also have a 1.4 teleconverter... Did you use your converter on these shots then? or did you take it off because it was to long?
TWO2956 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 16, 2006, 1:47 PM   #12
JohnG's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 8,529


I used the Sigma 1.4x TC for these photos. I can't honestly say if there is a performance difference between the Nikon version of the lens and the Canon so I can't help you there.

Here is what I can tell you:

The Sigma works very well. Focus may be a bit slow - by all accounts it suffers in comparison to Canon's 300mm 2.8 but that lens was twice the cost.

The only other drawback is I get quite a bit of CA - it's not pronounced until you look at a large version of the photo. But, there really isn't another alternative. And, as you can see it can capture some great results.

As for TC or no: There's no good answer to this one. Without the TC, the lens is tight (as I mentioned) but too short for decent outfield shots. I also don't like to make any changes near the field because of the dust so it's pretty much make the decision at the car and live with it.
JohnG is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 2:39 PM.