|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 552
|
![]()
[email protected] wrote:
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | ||
Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 46
|
![]()
Mr_Saginaw wrote:
Quote:
Quote:
Thanks - I will check out the Custom Function, and I will (probably) continue to experiment with Neat Image. As for the lens, I have probably done all that I can - for now. I have been pleased with the results from the Canon 85/1.8 - that is when I am sitting in a location where 85mm is the appropriate focal length. When that's the case, I think this lens is wonderful, and for ~$400, it didnt break the bank. I also added the Tamron 28-75/2.8 - again, ~$400. So, for ~$800 I have a good walk around lens and a really good fast lens (although it's a fixed focal lenght). Maybe I should opted only for the Sigma 70-200/2.8 for ~$800 (and it is next on my list), but it will have to wait - probably until next Christmas:-) |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 552
|
![]()
I've got the Tamron 28-75 f2.8 also... and your right... it's a very handy lens to have! I like this lens a lot...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 39
|
![]()
I just got my Tamron 28-75 2.8 last week too! I absolutely love it. I used it to take pictures of a basketball game as was very impressed. It is so much better than Sigma's 24-70 2.8. Everything is extremely sharp. My favorite lens so far.
Danny O. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,540
|
![]()
I'm going to get the Tamron based on Mr. Saginaw's recomendation and another guy Peter (Canadian) who was kind enough to send me some awesome photos taken with his Tamron.
After I get the lens I will post some samples, that will be hopefully good enough not to embarass myself! lol. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|